首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Cloud responses in the AMIP simulations of CMIP5 models in the southeastern Pacific marine subsidence region
【24h】

Cloud responses in the AMIP simulations of CMIP5 models in the southeastern Pacific marine subsidence region

机译:东南太平洋海洋沉降区CMIP5模型的AMIP模拟中的云响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The sensitivity of regimes dominated by low clouds has been identified as the largest contributor to uncertainties in tropical cloud feedback estimates in climate models. The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project simulations of the low cloud response to sea surface temperature (SST) are compared with satellite observations in the southeastern Pacific subsidence region. The model ensemble annual average cloud fraction is only about 10% lower than Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer observations; however, many models compensate by overestimating the cloud liquid water path (LWP), especially in areas typically associated with shallow cumulus. Analysis of the monthly distribution also shows that models have considerable difficulty in simulating the annual cycle in the cloud radiative effect (CRE), cloud fraction, and LWP likely due in part to underestimation of the strength of lower tropospheric stability and the depth of the boundary layer. The interannual sensitivity of CRE to SST agrees with observations in about half of the models, with the other half generally underestimating the cloud radiative forcing sensitivity. Model-observational differences are driven by the varying interannual responses in cloud fraction and LWP. Most models, including those that capture the mean interannual sensitivity of CRE to SST, have lower sensitivity in cloud fraction that is compensated by oversensitivity in the cloud LWP, especially in areas of more frequent shallow cumulus. Results presented here also highlight the possibility of using the vertical gradient of moist static energy (MSE) to test the fidelity of a model's representation of clouds and cloud sensitivity. Models that reproduce the observed distribution of cloud fraction with the lower tropospheric MSE gradient not only show better regional distribution and annual cycle in clouds and radiative forcing, but also demonstrate cloud and radiative sensitivities to SST that are more well correlated with the observed cloud sensitivities.
机译:低云为主的政体的敏感性已被确定为气候模型中热带云反馈估计的不确定性的最大贡献者。将低云对海面温度(SST)的大气模型比对项目模拟与东南太平洋沉降区的卫星观测结果进行了比较。该模型的集合年平均云量仅比中等分辨率成像光谱仪观测值低约10%。但是,许多模型都通过高估云水路径(LWP)来进行补偿,尤其是在通常与浅积云相关的区域中。对月度分布的分析还表明,在模拟云辐射效应(CRE),云分数和LWP的年周期方面,模型存在相当大的困难,这可能部分是由于低估了对流层较低的强度和边界深度层。 CRE对SST的年际敏感性与大约一半模型的观测结果一致,另一半通常低估了云层辐射强迫敏感性。模型观测的差异是由云层分数和LWP的年际变化引起的。大多数模型,包括那些捕捉到的CRE对SST的平均年际敏感性的模型,在云层中的敏感性较低,这可以通过云层LWP的过高敏感性来补偿,尤其是在浅积云频繁的地区。此处显示的结果还突出显示了使用湿静态能量(MSE)的垂直梯度测试模型表示云的保真度和云敏感度的可能性。用低对流层MSE梯度重现观测到的云量分布的模型不仅显示出更好的云区域分布和年周期以及辐射强迫,而且还显示出云和对SST的辐射敏感性与观测到的云敏感性更加相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号