...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2: The nonsense of mental health illness.
【24h】

Classification of schizophrenia. Part 2: The nonsense of mental health illness.

机译:精神分裂症的分类。第2部分:精神疾病的废话。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The classification of schizophrenia is currently under review in a coordinated worldwide consultation for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11)--the standard manuals for psychiatric classification. Classification can seem remote from nurses by appearing to be the antithesis of person-centred approaches to recovery. This should not be the case. Nurses need to critically engage with methods of classification in order to better understand the biological, psychological, social and political assumptions underpinning them. It will be shown that these assumptions often compete, and some common objections to the construct of schizophrenia can be viewed as a function of this. However, it is argued here that a truly holistic approach to care needs to engage with all these factors. The alternative is to simply reject the process as irrelevant to mental health nursing. It will be shown that a corollary of this latter approach is the invention of nonsense terms such as 'mental health illness' as a function of trying to simultaneously deny yet acknowledge the existence of mental illness.
机译:目前,精神病诊断和统计手册(DSM V)和国际疾病分类(ICD 11)(精神病学分类的标准手册)在全球范围内进行了协商,对精神分裂症的分类进行了审查。由于似乎是以人为中心的康复方法的对立面,分类似乎与护士背道而驰。事实并非如此。护士需要批判性地采用分类方法,以便更好地理解支撑它们的生物学,心理,社会和政治假设。可以证明,这些假设经常相互竞争,并且对于精神分裂症的构造有一些共同的反对意见可以看作是对此的函数。但是,这里有人认为,一种真正的整体护理方法需要涉及所有这些因素。另一种选择是简单地拒绝与心理健康护理无关的过程。可以证明,后一种方法的必然结果是发明了无意义的术语,例如“精神健康疾病”,以试图同时否认但承认精神疾病的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号