首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Can ELISpot replace the tuberculin skin test for latent tuberculosis?
【24h】

Can ELISpot replace the tuberculin skin test for latent tuberculosis?

机译:ELISpot可以代替潜伏性结核菌素皮肤试验吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) prior to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) therapy has been shown to decrease the incidence of active tuberculosis (TB) by more than 80%, and is recommended by the British Thoracic Society. In the absence of a gold standard test for LTBI, conventional screening currently involves taking a clinical history of risk factors, a chest X-ray and a tuberculin skin test (TST) which can be difficult to interpret in immunosuppressed patients. Alternative cellular immune-based screening tests have been developed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis. AIM: To examine, evaluate and summarize the quality of evidence on the use of interferon gamma release assay (the ELISpot test) in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis prior to initiation of anti-TNF-alpha and examine the agreement with the tuberculin skin test. METHODS: Ovid Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched using search terms that included tuberculosis, each of the current anti-TNF-alpha biological agents, TST and interferon-gamma release assay. Terms were searched using MeSH (medical subject headings) terms and/or free text where relevant. RESULTS: Discordance between tuberculin skin test and ELISpot is greater in individuals who have had the bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination and are taking corticosteroids. ELISpot technique using CFP-10 and ESAT-6 antigens is more sensitive than TST in detecting M. tuberculosis infection in patients taking corticosteroids. ELISpot avoids cross-reaction with BCG, making it a more specific test in this group of patients. Agreement between the tests was found to be fair (72.8% kappa value=0.38). CONCLUSION: Tuberculosis resulting from reactivation of latent tuberculosis following treatment with anti-TNF is a continuing problem. Screening reduces the risk but does not eliminate it. Further studies are needed into the cost-effectiveness and sensitivity of ELISpot and the tuberculin skin test in routine clinical practice.
机译:背景:在抗肿瘤坏死因子α(anti-TNF-alpha)治疗之前,潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的筛查和治疗已显示可将活动性结核(TB)的发生率降低80%以上,因此建议由英国胸科协会。在缺乏针对LTBI的金标准测试的情况下,常规筛查目前涉及对危险因素的临床病史,胸部X线检查和结核菌素皮肤测试(TST)进行检查,这在免疫抑制患者中可能难以解释。已经开发了替代性的基于细胞免疫的筛选测试来检测结核分枝杆菌。目的:检查,评估和总结有关在开始抗TNF-α之前使用干扰素γ释放测定(ELISpot试验)诊断潜伏性结核的证据质量,并检查与结核菌素皮肤试验的一致性。方法:使用包括结核病,当前每种抗TNF-α生物制剂,TST和干扰素-γ释放测定在内的搜索词搜索Ovid Medline,Embase和Cochrane库。使用MeSH(医学主题词)术语和/或相关的自由文本搜索术语。结果:接受卡介苗(BCG)芽孢杆菌疫苗接种和服用皮质类固醇的个体中,结核菌素皮肤试验与ELISpot之间的差异更大。使用CFP-10和ESAT-6抗原的ELISpot技术在检测服用糖皮质激素的患者的结核分枝杆菌感染中比TST更为灵敏。 ELISpot避免了与BCG的交叉反应,从而使其成为这一组患者的更具体的测试。测试之间的一致性被认为是公平的(72.8%的卡帕值= 0.38)。结论:抗TNF治疗后潜伏性结核再活化导致的结核病仍是一个持续的问题。筛查可以降低风险,但不能消除风险。在常规临床实践中,需要进一步研究ELISpot的成本效益和敏感性以及结核菌素皮肤试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号