首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biometeorology: Journal of the International Society of Biometeorology >Exploring two methods for statistical downscaling of Central European phenological time series
【24h】

Exploring two methods for statistical downscaling of Central European phenological time series

机译:探索中欧物候时间序列统计缩减的两种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study we set out to investigate the possibility of linking phenological phases throughout the vegetation cycle, as a local-scale biological phenomenon, directly with large-scale atmospheric variables via two different empirical downscaling techniques. In recent years a number of methods have been developed to transfer atmospheric information at coarse General Circulation Model's grid resolutions to local scales and individual points. Here multiple linear regression (MLR) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) have been selected as downscaling methods. Different validation experiments (e.g. temporal cross-validation, split-sample tests) are used to test the performance of both approaches and compare them for time series of 17 phenological phases and air temperatures from Central Europe as microscale variables. A number of atmospheric variables over the North Atlantic and Europe are utilized as macroscale predictors. The period considered is 1951-1998. Temporal cross-validation reveals that the CCA model generally performs better than MLR, which explains 20%-50% of the phenological variances, whereas the CCA model shows a range from 40% to over 60% throughout most of the vegetation cycle. To show the validity of employing phenological observations for downscaling purposes both methods (MLR and CCA) are also applied to gridded local air temperature time series over Central Europe. In this case there is no obvious superiority of the CCA model over the MLR model. Both models show explained variances from 40% to over 70% in the temporal cross-validation experiment. The results of this study indicate that time series of phenological occurrence dates are very compatible with the needs of empirical downscaling originally developed of local-scale atmospheric variables.
机译:在这项研究中,我们着手研究通过两种不同的经验降尺度技术,将整个植被周期中物候阶段作为局部尺度的生物现象直接与大规模大气变量联系起来的可能性。近年来,已经开发出了许多方法,可以以粗略的一般环流模型的网格分辨率将大气信息传输到局部尺度和单个点。在这里,多元线性回归(MLR)和规范相关分析(CCA)已被选为缩减规模的方法。使用不同的验证实验(例如时间交叉验证,分割样本测试)来测试这两种方法的性能,并将它们比较以17个物候阶段的时间序列和中欧的气温作为微观变量。北大西洋和欧洲的许多大气变量都被用作宏观预测指标。所考虑的时期是1951-1998年。时间交叉验证表明,CCA模型通常比MLR表现更好,后者解释了20%-50%的物候变化,而CCA模型在整个植被周期中显示范围从40%到60%以上。为了证明将物候观测结果用于降尺度的有效性,这两种方法(MLR和CCA)也都应用于中欧的网格化本地气温时间序列。在这种情况下,CCA模型与MLR模型之间没有明显的优势。在时间交叉验证实验中,两个模型都显示出解释的方差,从40%到超过70%。这项研究的结果表明,物候发生日期的时间序列与本地尺度大气变量最初发展的经验降尺度的需求非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号