...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cancer =: Journal International du Cancer >The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC.
【24h】

The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC.

机译:在大型筛选试验ERSPC中,研究组对前列腺癌治疗的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Prostate cancer (PC) mortality is the most valid end-point in screening trials, but could be influenced by the choice of initial treatment if treatment has an effect on mortality. In this study, PC treatment was compared between the screening and control arms in a screening trial. Data were collected from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). The characteristics and initial treatment of PC cases detected in the screening and the control arm were compared. Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of study arm on treatment, adjusting for potential confounders and with statistical imputation of missing values. A total of 8,389 PC cases were detected, 5,422 in the screening arm and 3,145 in the control arm. Polytomous regression showed that trial arm was associated with treatment choice after correction for missing values, especially in men with high-risk PC. A control subject with high-risk PC was more likely than a screen subject to receive radiotherapy (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.01-2.05, p = 0.047), expectant management (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.33-6.42, p = 0.007) or hormonal treatment (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.026) instead of radical prostatectomy. However, trial arm had only a minor role in treatment choice compared to other variables. In conclusion, a small effect of trial arm on treatment choice was seen, particularly in men with high-risk PC. Therefore, differences in treatment between arms are unlikely to play a major role in the interpretation of the results of the ERSPC.
机译:前列腺癌(PC)死亡率是筛查试验中最有效的终点,但如果治疗对死亡率有影响,则可能会受到初始治疗选择的影响。在这项研究中,在筛查试验中比较了筛查臂和对照臂之间的PC治疗。数据是从欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究(ERSPC)中收集的。比较了在筛查和对照组中发现的PC病例的特征和初步治疗。多因素逻辑回归分析用于评估研究组对治疗的影响,调整潜在的混杂因素,并统计缺失值。总共检测到8389例PC病例,筛查组为5422例,对照组为3145例。多角度回归分析显示,校正遗漏值后,试验臂与治疗选择相关,尤其是在高危PC患者中。具有高风险PC的对照受试者比接受筛查的受试者更有可能接受放射治疗(OR:1.43,95%CI:1.01-2.05,p = 0.047),预期管理(OR:2.92,95%CI:1.33-6.42 ,p = 0.007)或激素治疗(OR:1.77,95%CI:1.07-2.94,p = 0.026),而不是根治性前列腺切除术。但是,与其他变量相比,试验组在治疗选择中仅起很小的作用。总之,试验臂对治疗选择的影响很小,尤其是在高危PC患者中。因此,在解释ERSPC结果时,手臂之间的治疗差异不太可能起主要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号