...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biometeorology: Journal of the International Society of Biometeorology >Comparison of different methods of estimating the mean radiant temperature in outdoor thermal comfort studies
【24h】

Comparison of different methods of estimating the mean radiant temperature in outdoor thermal comfort studies

机译:户外热舒适性研究中不同的平均辐射温度估算方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Correlations between outdoor thermal indices and the calculated or measured mean radiant temperature T-mrt are in general of high importance because of the combined effect on human energy balance in outdoor spaces. The most accurate way to determine T-mrt is by means of integral radiation measurements, i.e. measuring the short- and long-wave radiation from six directions using pyranometers and pyrgeometers, an expensive and not always an easily available procedure. Some studies use globe thermometers combined with air temperature and wind speed sensors. An alternative way to determine T-mrt is based on output from the RayMan model from measured data of incoming global radiation and morphological features of the monitoring site in particular sky view factor (SVF) data. The purpose of this paper is to compare different methods to assess the mean radiant temperature T-mrt in terms of differences to a reference condition (T-mrt calculated from field measurements) and to resulting outdoor comfort levels expressed as PET and UTCI values. The T-mrt obtained from field measurements is a combination of air temperature, wind speed and globe temperature data according to the forced ventilation formula of ISO 7726 for data collected in Glasgow, UK. Four different methods were used in the RayMan model for T-mrt calculations: input data consisting exclusively of data measured at urban sites; urban data excluding solar radiation, estimated SVF data and solar radiation data measured at a rural site; urban data excluding solar radiation with SVF data for each site; urban data excluding solar radiation and including solar radiation at the rural site taking no account of SVF information. Results show that all methods overestimate T-mrt when compared to ISO calculations. Correlations were found to be significant for the first method and lower for the other three. Results in terms of comfort (PET, UTCI) suggest that reasonable estimates could be made based on global radiation data measured at the urban site or as a surrogate of missing SR data or globe temperature data recorded at the urban area on global radiation data measured at a rural location
机译:由于对室外空间中人类能量平衡的综合影响,室外热指数与计算或测得的平均辐射温度T-mrt之间的相关性通常非常重要。确定T-mrt的最准确方法是通过整体辐射测量,即使用总辐射表和总辐射表从六个方向测量短波和长波辐射,这是一种昂贵且并不总是容易获得的过程。一些研究将地球温度计与空气温度和风速传感器结合使用。确定T-mrt的另一种方法是基于RayMan模型的输出,该输出来自传入的全球辐射的测量数据以及监视站点的形态特征(特别是天空视图因子(SVF)数据)。本文的目的是比较不同的方法来评估平均辐射温度T-mrt与参考条件(根据现场测量计算得出的T-mrt)之间的差异,以及由此得出的室外舒适度,以PET和UTCI值表示。根据ISO 7726的强制通风公式,通过野外测量获得的T-mrt是气温,风速和地球温度数据的组合,用于英国格拉斯哥收集的数据。在RayMan模型中,有四种不同的方法用于T-mrt计算:输入数据完全由在城市站点测得的数据组成;城市数据,不包括太阳辐射,估计的SVF数据和在农村站点测量的太阳辐射数据;每个站点的城市数据(不包括太阳辐射和SVF数据);不包括SVF信息的城市数据(不包括太阳辐射,包括农村地区的太阳辐射)。结果表明,与ISO计算相比,所有方法都高估了T-mrt。发现第一种方法的相关性显着,而其他三种方法的相关性则较低。关于舒适度的结果(PET,UTCI)表明,可以基于在市区现场测得的全球辐射数据或作为在市区测得的全球辐射数据上市区记录的缺失SR数据或地球温度数据的替代来做出合理的估计。农村地区

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号