首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia.
【24h】

Ecosystem services as a practicable concept for natural resource management: some lessons from Australia.

机译:生态系统服务是自然资源管理的可行概念:澳大利亚的一些经验教训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ecosystem services (ES) concept initially gathered momentum amongst the Australian scientific community in the late 1990 s. This article seeks to investigate if the earlier Australian ES research efforts and findings have been adopted and utilised by Australian resource managers, highlighting factors that may have enabled or prevented this adoption. Combining a literature review, interviews and observations from Australian regional planning, we offer a snapshot of resource managers' experiences in engaging with the ES concept. Although based on a small pilot, our results suggest that thinking about biodiversity and ecosystems as providers of economic value has broadly found its way into Australian natural resource management (NRM) practice, but that the 'language' of ES is not necessarily found new, clear or practicable. Interviewees mentioned the lack of an 'ES toolbox', combined with clear national and regional policy drivers, as a major barrier to their broader adoption of the ES concept. For the ES concept to be used meaningfully and effectively at regional and local scales, a concerted effort at the nexus of NRM research, policy and practice will be required to further embed ES thinking in participatory planning processes. We argue that a well-facilitated process of group learning and reasoning about nature's values that is grounded in local knowledge and experience may ultimately better approximate the 'true' value of a region's natural capital than traditional positivist approaches aimed at comprehensive quantification and valuation of ES.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.737372
机译:在1990年代后期,生态系统服务(ES)概念最初在澳大利亚科学界引起了轰动。本文旨在调查澳大利亚资源管理者是否采用了澳大利亚早期的ES研究工作和调查结果,并着重指出了可能导致或阻止采用这种方法的因素。结合文献综述,采访和澳大利亚区域规划的观察,我们提供了资源管理者参与ES概念的经验的简要介绍。尽管基于一个小型试验,但我们的结果表明,将生物多样性和生态系统作为经济价值提供者的思考已广泛应用于澳大利亚自然资源管理(NRM)的实践中,但是ES的“语言”并不一定是新发现的,明确或可行。受访者提到,缺少“ ES工具箱”以及明确的国家和地区政策驱动因素,这是他们广泛采用ES概念的主要障碍。为了使ES概念在区域和地方范围内得到有效有效的利用,需要NRM研究,政策和实践之间的共同努力,以将ES思想进一步嵌入到参与式计划过程中。我们认为,与传统的实证主义方法(旨在对ES进行全面量化和评估)相比,基于本地知识和经验的良好的团体学习和推理过程可以最终更好地逼近区域自然资本的“真实”价值。 。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.737372

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号