首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Earth Sciences >Evaluation of intermediate TanDEM-X digital elevation data products over Tasmania using other digital elevation models and accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database
【24h】

Evaluation of intermediate TanDEM-X digital elevation data products over Tasmania using other digital elevation models and accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database

机译:使用其他数字高程模型和澳大利亚国家重力数据库中的准确高度,评估塔斯马尼亚岛上的中间TanDEM-X数字高程数据产品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The successful operation of the TanDEM-X satellite mission is the start of a new era of globally consistent and accurate digital elevation data for planet Earth. In this work available 12 m-resolution intermediate TanDEM-X products (DEM: digital elevation model; HEM: height error map; COV: coverage map; WAM: water indication mask) are evaluated over Tasmania. Elevations from the TanDEM-X intermediate digital elevation model (IDEM) are compared with (a) other global DEMs (30 m-resolution SRTM1 USGS v3 and 30 m-resolution Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission Reflectometer (ASTER GDEM2), (b) the local 25 m-resolution DEM made available by Tasmanian environmental authority (DPIPWE), and (c) over 15 000 accurate ground-control-points (GCPs) from the Australian National Gravity Database (ANGD). The comparison with ASTER and SRTM over the area of Tasmania involves over 500 million valid TanDEM-X IDEM elevations. The root-mean-square (RMS) of 8.8m indicates a reasonable to good agreement of TanDEM-X IDEM and SRTM, while ASTER shows almost twice the disagreement in terms of RMS (approximate to 16.5 m). Both, ASTER and SRTM show a (mean) offset of -1.9m and -2.3m w.r.t. TanDEM-X IDEM, respectively. By comparisons with GCPs, we find that SRTM and ASTER overestimate the terrain height. The comparison with the AGND GCPs also allows an estimate of the absolute accuracy of the IDEM, which is found to be superior to that of SRTM or ASTER. The RMS error of 6.6m shows that the IDEM is close to the officially denoted 4m absolute vertical accuracy considering that the GCPs are not error free. The height error map information layer is found to a suitable first indicator of the (local) accuracy of the IDEM in a relative sense. However, we find that the HEM tends to underestimate observed differences to the GCPs. Terrain-type analyses reveal that the TanDEM-X IDEM is a very consistent elevation database over Tasmania. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the new TanDEM-X elevation data sets provide improved high-resolution terrain information over Tasmania and beyond.
机译:TanDEM-X卫星任务的成功运行,是地球上全球一致且准确的数字高程数据新时代的开始。在这项工作中,在塔斯马尼亚州评估了12 m分辨率的中间TanDEM-X产品(DEM:数字高程模型; HEM:高度误差图; COV:覆盖图; WAM:水指示面罩)。 TanDEM-X中间数字高程模型(IDEM)的高程与(a)其他全球DEM(分辨率为30 m的SRTM1 USGS v3和分辨率为30 m的先进星载热反射仪(ASTER GDEM2))进行了比较,(b)本地塔斯马尼亚环境局(DPIPWE)提供了25 m分辨率的DEM,(c)来自澳大利亚国家重力数据库(ANGD)的超过15000个准确的地面控制点(GCP),与该地区的ASTER和SRTM进行了比较塔斯马尼亚州的TanDEM-X IDEM有效海拔超过5亿,均方根(RMS)为8.8m,表明TanDEM-X IDEM与SRTM有合理到良好的一致性,而ASTER的RMS差异几乎是两倍(大约16.5 m),Ast和SRTM的TanDEM-X IDEM的(平均)偏移分别为-1.9m和-2.3m,与GCP进行比较,我们发现SRTM和ASTER高估了地形高度。与AGND GCP的比较还可以估算ab IDEM的绝对精度优于SRTM或ASTER。 RMS误差为6.6m,表明GEM并非无误差,因此IDEM接近正式表示的4m绝对垂直精度。发现高度误差图信息层是相对意义上的IDEM(局部)精度的合适的第一指标。但是,我们发现HEM往往低估了与GCP的观测差异。地形类型分析表明,TanDEM-X IDEM是塔斯马尼亚岛上非常一致的海拔数据库。总之,我们的研究表明,新的TanDEM-X高程数据集在塔斯马尼亚州及以后提供了改进的高分辨率地形信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号