...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of Entomology >Does the cutting of lucerne (Medicago sativa) encourage the movement of arthropod pests and predators into the adjacent crop?
【24h】

Does the cutting of lucerne (Medicago sativa) encourage the movement of arthropod pests and predators into the adjacent crop?

机译:切割紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)是否会促进节肢动物害虫和天敌向相邻作物的迁移?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Lucerne (Medicago sativa) has been suggested as an ideal refuge habitat as part of an integrated pest management (IPM) program because it harbours high numbers of beneficial arthropods. Whether or not cutting of lucerne encourages the movement of these beneficials into adjacent target crops is unknown. Vacuum samples were used to determine the effects of cutting lucerne on arthropod abundance (pests and predators) within lucerne and adjacent soyabean (Glycine max) crops. Vacuum-sample collections of arthropods were conducted before and after lucerne cutting on seven occasions in four fields over two seasons. In the lucerne, 10 m by 1 m strips parallel to the crop interface were sampled at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 m from the interface. In the soyabean, 10 m of row were sampled at the same distances from the crop interface. The abundance of predators in lucerne was reduced immediately after cutting at all distances from the interface. Predator abundance in soyabean did not show any change. The cutting of lucerne significantly reduced pest numbers within the lucerne but had little effect on pest abundance in the adjacent soyabean. The temporal pattern in pest and predator abundance was very different for each field sampled. Generally, arthropods decreased in abundance after cutting and gradually increased as the lucerne grew back. In soybeans, arthropod numbers fluctuated regardless of the cutting of the lucerne. Cutting of lucerne alone does not guarantee movement of predators into the adjacent target crop. The presence of lucerne fields within a cropping area may have some impact on regional predator populations, and so still be useful for IPM programs, but this has yet to be tested critically..
机译:卢塞恩(苜蓿苜蓿)已被建议作为一种理想的避难所栖息地,作为病虫害综合治理(IPM)计划的一部分,因为它拥有大量的有益节肢动物。切割卢塞恩是否能促进这些有益作物向相邻目标作物的转移尚不清楚。真空样品用于确定切花卢塞恩对卢塞恩和相邻大豆(大豆最大)作物中节肢动物丰富度(小虫和天敌)的影响。在两个季节的四个区域中,在七次切开卢塞恩前后,进行了节肢动物的真空采样收集。在卢塞恩州,在距交界处5、10、15、20和30 m处平行于农作物交界处的10 m x 1 m条带被采样。在大豆中,在距农作物界面相同距离处采样了10 m行。在从界面切开所有距离后,卢塞恩中的捕食者数量立即减少。大豆中的捕食者丰度未显示任何变化。切割卢塞恩可显着减少卢塞恩内的有害生物数量,但对相邻大豆中的有害生物丰度影响很小。对于每个采样场,害虫和捕食者丰富度的时间格局都非常不同。通常,节肢动物在切割后丰度下降,随着卢塞恩的生长而逐渐增加。在大豆中,节肢动物数量的波动与卢塞恩的切割无关。单单切割卢塞恩并不能保证捕食者将其移入邻近的目标作物。种植区域内存在的卢塞恩田地可能对区域捕食者种群产生一定影响,因此对于IPM计划仍然有用,但这尚未经过严格测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号