...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of antimicrobial agents >Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in Belgium
【24h】

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in Belgium

机译:比利时经临床和确诊诊断为社区获得性肺炎的疫苗接种者和非疫苗接种者的肺炎链球菌分离株的抗菌药敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We assessed the in vitro susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with confirmed community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to β-lactams, macrolides and fluoroquinolones and the association of non-susceptibility and resistance with serotypes/serogroups (STs/SGs), patient's risk factors and vaccination status. Samples (blood or lower respiratory tract) were obtained in 2007-2009 from 249 patients (from seven hospitals in Belgium) with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of CAP [median age 61 years (11.6% aged <5 years); 85% without previous antibiotic therapy; 86% adults with level II Niederman's severity score]. MIC determination (EUCAST breakpoints) showed for: (i) amoxicillin, 6% non-susceptible; cefuroxime (oral), 6.8% resistant; (ii) macrolides: 24.9% erythromycin-resistant [93.5% erm(B)-positive] but 98.4% telithromycin-susceptible; and (iii) levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, all susceptible. Amongst SGs: ST14, all resistant to macrolides and most intermediate to β-lactams; SG19 (>94% ST19A), 73.5% resistant to macrolides and 18-21% intermediate to β-lactams; and SG6, 33% resistant to clarithromycin. Apparent vaccine failures: 3/17 for 7-valent vaccine (children; ST6B, 23F); 16/29 for 23-valent vaccine (adults ST3, 7F, 12F, 14, 19A, 22F, 23F, 33F). Isolates from nursing home residents, hospitalised patients and patients with non-respiratory co-morbidities showed increased MICs for amoxicillin, all β-lactams, and β-lactams and macrolides, respectively. Regarding antibiotic susceptibilities: (i) amoxicillin is still useful for empirical therapy but with a high daily dose; (ii) cefuroxime axetil and macrolides (but not telithromycin) are inappropriate for empirical therapy; and (iii) moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are the next 'best empirical choice' (no resistant isolates) but levofloxacin will require 500 mg twice-daily dosing for effective coverage.
机译:我们评估了确诊社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的肺炎链球菌分离株对β-内酰胺类,大环内酯类和氟喹诺酮类药物的体外敏感性,以及非敏感性和耐药性与血清型/血清型(STs / SGs),患者风险的关系因素和疫苗接种状况。 2007-2009年从249例临床和放射学诊断为CAP的患者(中位年龄为61岁(年龄<5岁)为11.6%)中(比利时的七家医院)获得了样本(血液或下呼吸道);未经预先抗生素治疗的85%; Niederman严重程度评分为II级的成年人为86%]。 MIC测定(EUCAST断点)显示:(i)阿莫西林,6%不敏感;头孢呋辛(口服),耐药6.8%; (ii)大环内酯类药物:24.9%的抗红霉素[93.5%的erm(B)阳性],但98.4%的泰利霉素易感; (iii)左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星均易感。在SG中:ST14,全部抗大环内酯类药物,对β-内酰胺类药物最有效。 SG19(> 94%ST19A),对大环内酯类药物有73.5%的抵抗力,在β-内酰胺类中有18-21%的中间体; SG6,对克拉霉素有33%的耐药性。明显的疫苗失败:7价疫苗为3/17(儿童; ST6B,23F);对于23价疫苗(成人ST3、7F,12F,14、19A,22F,23F,33F)为16/29。来自疗养院居民,住院患者和非呼吸系统合并症患者的分离株显示阿莫西林,所有β-内酰胺,β-内酰胺和大环内酯类药物的MIC升高。关于抗生素敏感性:(i)阿莫西林仍可用于经验治疗,但每日剂量较高; (ii)头孢呋辛酯和大环内酯类药物(但不是泰利霉素)不适用于经验治疗; (iii)莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星是下一个“最佳经验选择”(无耐药菌株),但左氧氟沙星需要每日两次500毫克剂量才能有效覆盖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号