首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Why the Liverpool Care Pathway should be replaced
【24h】

Why the Liverpool Care Pathway should be replaced

机译:为什么应该更换利物浦关怀途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In recent months the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) has been the object of substantial criticism in the media and elsewhere. Alarming news stories have circulated about the LCP and the care of the elderly in acute hospitals. The stories share common themes with the complaints that led to the Mid Staffordshire public inquiry. Serious concerns were expressed that patients were wrongly being denied nutrition and hydration while being placed on the LCP. The review of the LCP was commissioned by Care and Support Minister, Norman Lamb, in January 2013, because of the serious concerns arising from the media reports. The independent review panel was chaired by Baroness Neuberger and was reported on 15 July 2013. The report was entitled Independent Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (2013).
机译:近几个月来,利物浦的护理途径(LCP)一直是媒体和其他地方的主要批评对象。关于LCP和急诊医院中老年人护理的新闻报道令人震惊。这些故事与引起中斯塔福德郡公众调查的抱怨有着共同的主题。有人表示严重关切的是,患者在被放置在LCP上时被错误地拒绝了营养和水分补充。由于媒体报道引起严重关注,护理和支持部长诺曼·兰姆(Norman Lamb)于2013年1月委托对LCP进行审查。独立审查小组由诺伊伯格男爵夫人主持,报告于2013年7月15日发表。该报告的标题为《利物浦护理途径的独立审查》(2013年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号