首页> 外文期刊>International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids >Comparison using Cartesian and covariant velocity components on non-orthogonal collocated grids
【24h】

Comparison using Cartesian and covariant velocity components on non-orthogonal collocated grids

机译:在非正交并置网格上使用笛卡尔和协变速度分量进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, the Cartesian velocity components and the covariant velocity components are adopted respectively as the main variables in solving the momentum equations in the SIMPLE-like method to calculate a lid-driven cavity flow onnon-orthogonal collocated grids. In total, more than 400 computer runs are carried out for a two-dimensional problem. The accuracy and convergence performance of using Cartesian and covariant velocity components are compared in detail. Comparisons showthat both the Cartesian and covariant velocity methods have the same numerical accuracy. The convergence rate of the covariant velocity method can be faster than that of the Cartesian velocity method if the relaxation factor for pressure is small enough.However, the convergence range of the relaxation factor for pressure in the covariant velocity method is quite narrow. When the cross-derivatives in the pressure-correction equation are retained approximately, its convergence performance can be greatlyimproved.
机译:本文采用直角速度分量和协变速度分量作为SIMPLE样方法求解动量方程的主要变量,以计算非正交并置网格上盖驱动的空腔流。对于一个二维问题,总共进行了400多次计算机运行。详细比较了使用笛卡尔和协方差速度分量的准确性和收敛性能。比较表明,直角速度法和协变速度法都具有相同的数值精度。如果压力的松弛因子足够小,协变速度方法的收敛速度可以比笛卡尔速度方法的收敛速度快,但是协变速度方法的压力松弛因子的收敛范围很窄。当压力校正方程中的交叉导数近似保留时,可以大大提高其收敛性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号