首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Applied Engineering Research >The Impact of SARFAESI Act 2002 in recovering the Non Performance Assets in Public Sector Banks: A study on Recovery in SBI, CBI, CB, BOB and PNB (2008 to 2014)
【24h】

The Impact of SARFAESI Act 2002 in recovering the Non Performance Assets in Public Sector Banks: A study on Recovery in SBI, CBI, CB, BOB and PNB (2008 to 2014)

机译:2002年SARFAESI法案对收回公共部门银行不良资产的影响:对SBI,CBI,CB,BOB和PNB的收回进行的研究(2008年至2014年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The banking sector in India is in a crisis with the increase in burden of bad loans provisioning and the decline in profitability of commercial sector banks particularly Public sector banks. "Bankers are the heart and soul of any business. The economy of the country also mostly depends on the functioning of banking institutions. As per RBI Statistics, annual growth of bank credit in India, which had crossed 30% in the boom years of 2004-2007, has declined to 9.7% in 2014-15 and further to 9.4% in the first half of 2015-16. The decline in credit growth has affect the profitability of scheduled commercial banks, with public sector banks suffering the most in this profit wring. A breather in the form of SARFAESI ACT 2002 was introduced by the recommendation of Narasimham Committee II has been instrumental to recover the identified NPA without intervention of the court. It allows the bank to recover the loan by acquiring/possessing the financial assets pledged or mortgaged with the bankers at the time of availing of loans by borrowers. This paper attempts to study the process and effect of SARFASEI Act 2002 and its impact in recovering the non-performing assets in public sector banks in India. To ascertain the recovery process of SARFAESI Act with the other recovery methods adopted viz; Lok Adalats, DRT and CDR in chosen public sector banks. The study has been made to find out the percentage of recovery made in SARFAESI Act 2002 in compare with Lok Adalat and DRT and also to identify the number of cases referred to the Lok Adalat, DRT & SARFAESI Act 2002 with respect to the banks State Bank of India, Canara Bank, Central Bank of India, Bank of Baroda and Punjab National Bank taken for the study.
机译:印度的银行业正处于危机之中,不良贷款准备金负担增加,商业部门银行特别是公共部门银行的盈利能力下降。 “银行家是任何企业的心脏和灵魂。该国的经济在很大程度上也取决于银行机构的运作。根据印度储备银行的统计,印度银行信贷的年增长率在2004年的繁荣时期已超过30% -2007年下降至2014-15年的9.7%,2015-16年上半年进一步下降至9.4%。信贷增长的下降影响了定期商业银行的盈利能力,其中公共部门银行的利润最大根据Narasimham委员会II的建议,引入了SARFAESI ACT 2002形式的喘息手段,这有助于在无需法院干预的情况下收回已确定的不良资产,这使银行可以通过收购/拥有抵押的金融资产来收回贷款。本文试图研究《 2002年SARFASEI法案》的过程和效果,以及其在公共领域追回不良资产的影响。印度的银行。为了确定SARFAESI法案的恢复过程以及采用的其他恢复方法,即选定的公共部门银行中的Lok Adalats,DRT和CDR。已经进行了研究,以找出2002年SARFAESI法案与Lok Adalat和DRT相比所恢复的百分比,并确定与州立银行有关的涉及2002年Lok Adalat,DRT和SARFAESI法案的案件数量。印度,卡纳拉银行,印度中央银行,巴罗达银行和旁遮普国家银行参加了这项研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号