首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Applied Engineering Research >Comparison of Mamdani-Type and Sugeno-Type Fuzzy Inference Systems for Fuzzy Real Time Scheduling
【24h】

Comparison of Mamdani-Type and Sugeno-Type Fuzzy Inference Systems for Fuzzy Real Time Scheduling

机译:模糊实时调度的Mamdani型和Sugeno型模糊推理系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The classical analysis of real time systems tries to ensure that the instance of every task finishes before its absolute deadline (strict guarantee). The probabilistic approach tends to estimate the probability that it will happen. The deterministic timed behavior is an important parameter for analysing the robustness of the system. Most of related works are mainly based on the determinism of time constraints. However, in most cases, these parameters are non-precise. The vagueness of parameters suggests the use of fuzzy logic to decide in what order the requests should be executed to reduce the chance of a request being missed. There are two common inference methods Mamdani's fuzzy inference method and Takagi-Sugeno-Kang, method of fuzzy inference. The results of the two fuzzy inference systems (FIS) for generated output are compared. This paper outlines the basic difference between the Mamdani-type FIS and Sugeno-type FIS. It also shows which one is a better choice of the two FIS for real time system.
机译:实时系统的经典分析试图确保每个任务的实例在其绝对期限(严格保证)之前完成。概率方法倾向于估计其发生的可能性。确定性定时行为是分析系统健壮性的重要参数。大多数相关工作主要基于时间约束的确定性。但是,在大多数情况下,这些参数是不精确的。参数的模糊性建议使用模糊逻辑来决定应以何种顺序执行请求,以减少丢失请求的机会。 Mamdani的模糊推理方法和Takagi-Sugeno-Kang是两种常见的推理方法。比较了两个模糊推理系统(FIS)生成的输出的结果。本文概述了Mamdani型FIS和Sugeno型FIS之间的基本区别。它还显示了在实时系统中,两个FIS中哪个是更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号