首页> 外文期刊>International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering >On the techniques for constructing admissible stress fields in model verification: Performances on engineering examples
【24h】

On the techniques for constructing admissible stress fields in model verification: Performances on engineering examples

机译:关于在模型验证中构造允许应力场的技术:工程实例性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Robust global/goal-oriented error estimation is used nowadays to control the approximate finite element (FE) solutions obtained from simulation. In the context of computational mechanics, the construction of admissible stress fields (i.e. stress tensors which verify the equilibrium equations) is required to set up strict and guaranteed error bounds (using residual-based error estimators) and plays an important role in the quality of the error estimates. This work focuses on the different procedures used in the calculation of admissible stress fields, which is a crucial and technically complicated point. The three main techniques that currently exist, called the element equilibration technique (EET), the star-patch equilibration technique (SPET), and the element equilibration + star-patch technique (EESPT), are investigated and compared with respect to three different criteria, namely the quality of associated error estimators, computational cost, and easiness of practical implementation into commercial FE codes. The numerical results that are presented focus on industrial problems; they highlight the main advantages and drawbacks of the different methods and show that the behavior of the three estimators, which have the same convergence rate as the exact global error, is consistent. 2D and 3D experiments have been carried out in order to compare the performance and the computational cost of the three different approaches. The analysis of the results reveals that the SPET is more accurate than EET and EESPT methods, but the corresponding computational cost is higher. Overall, the numerical tests prove the interest of the hybrid method EESPT and show that it is a correct compromise between the quality of the error estimate, practical implementation and computational cost. Furthermore, the influence of the cost function involved in the EET and the EESPT is studied in order to optimize the estimators.
机译:如今,使用鲁棒的面向全局/目标的误差估计来控制通过仿真获得的近似有限元(FE)解。在计算力学方面,需要建立允许的应力场(即验证平衡方程的应力张量)以建立严格且有保证的误差范围(使用基于残差的误差估计器),并且在保证质量的过程中起着重要作用。误差估计。这项工作着重于计算容许应力场时所使用的不同程序,这是至关重要且技术上很复杂的一点。针对三种不同的标准,研究并比较了当前存在的三种主要技术,分别称为元素平衡技术(EET),星型平衡技术(SPET)和元素平衡+星型平衡技术(EESPT)。 ,即相关误差估计器的质量,计算成本以及在商业FE代码中实际实施的简便性。给出的数值结果集中在工业问题上。他们强调了不同方法的主要优点和缺点,并表明具有与精确全局误差相同的收敛速度的三个估计量的行为是一致的。为了比较三种不同方法的性能和计算成本,已经进行了2D和3D实验。结果分析表明,SPET比EET和EESPT方法更准确,但相应的计算成本更高。总体而言,数值测试证明了混合方法EESPT的重要性,并表明这是误差估计质量,实际实现和计算成本之间的正确折衷。此外,为了优化估计量,研究了EET和EESPT中涉及的成本函数的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号