首页> 外文期刊>Information Sciences: An International Journal >Rational behavior in peer-to-peer profile obfuscation for anonymous keyword search
【24h】

Rational behavior in peer-to-peer profile obfuscation for anonymous keyword search

机译:对等配置文件混淆中用于匿名关键字搜索的理性行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

User profiling in web search has the advantage of enabling personalized web search: the quality of the results offered by the search engine to the user is increased by taking the user's interests into account when presenting those results. The negative side is that the interests and the query history of users may contain information considered as private; hence, technology should be provided for users to avoid profiling if they wish so. There are several anti-profiling approaches in web search, from basic level countermeasures to private information retrieval and including profile obfuscation. Except private information retrieval (PIR), which hides the retrieved item from the database, the rest of approaches focus on anonymizing the user's identity and fall into the category of anonymous keyword search (also named sometimes user-private information retrieval). Most current PIR protocols are ill-suited to provide PIR from a search engine or large database, due to their complexity and their assumption that the database actively cooperates in the PIR protocol. Peer-to-peer profile obfuscation protocols appear as a competitive option provided that peers are rationally interested in helping each other. We present a game-theoretic analysis of P2P profile obfuscation protocols which shows under which conditions helping each other is in the peers' rational interest.
机译:Web搜索中的用户配置文件具有启用个性化Web搜索的优势:当呈现这些结果时,通过考虑用户的兴趣,可以提高搜索引擎向用户提供的结果的质量。不利的一面是,用户的兴趣和查询历史记录可能包含被视为私有的信息;因此,如果用户愿意,应该为用户提供避免配置文件的技术。从基本级别的对策到私人信息检索,包括配置文件混淆,Web搜索中存在多种反配置文件方法。除了从数据库中隐藏检索到的项目的私人信息检索(PIR)之外,其余方法都侧重于匿名用户的身份并属于匿名关键字搜索(有时也称为用户私人信息检索)类别。由于当前的PIR协议的复杂性和假定数据库在PIR协议中积极合作,因此大多数当前的PIR协议不适合从搜索引擎或大型数据库提供PIR。点对点配置文件混淆协议似乎是一种竞争选择,只要对端有理性地希望互相帮助的兴趣。我们对P2P配置文件混淆协议进行了博弈论分析,该分析表明了在哪些条件下互相帮助符合同仁的合理利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号