...
首页> 外文期刊>International angiology: A journal of the International Union of Angiology >Carotid endarterectomy with or without concomitant aortocoronary bypass in elderly patients: an analysis of 599 procedures.
【24h】

Carotid endarterectomy with or without concomitant aortocoronary bypass in elderly patients: an analysis of 599 procedures.

机译:老年患者颈动脉内膜切除术伴或不伴主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术:599例手术分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIM: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been established as an effective treatment of carotid artery disease. Controversial remains the performance of CEA in elderly patients. Aim of this study is to report the mid-term (30 days) neurological outcome in patients older than 75 years after CEA with or without simultaneous aortocoronary bypass (CABG). METHODS: 599 patients undergoing CEA from January 2000 to December 2007 were enrolled. Isolated CEA was performed in 398/599 (66%) patients (group A). In 201/599(34%) patients (group B) was performed a combined procedure (CEA/CABG). 90/398(23%) patients of group A (group A1) and 49/201(24%) patients of group B (group B1) were >75 years old. 308/398 (77%) patients of group A (group A2) and 152/201 (76%) patients of group B (group B2) were <75 years old. Mortality, TIA and stroke rates as well as pre- and postoperative Rankin scale (RS) were reported. RESULTS: In isolated CEAs, mortality was higher in group A1 (A1:1.1% vs A2:0%, P=0.51). We found no significant differences in rates of TIA (A1:4.4% versus A2:3.2%, P=0.79) or stroke (A1:2.2% versus A2:1.9%, P=0.98). In CEA/CABG, mortality was 0% in group B1 and 5.9% in group B2 (P=0.17). No significant differences in rates of TIA (B1:2% versus B2:3%, P=0.76) or stroke (B1:2% versus B2:5%, P=0.70) were reported. Preoperative RS was the only positive predictor for postoperative stroke in groups A1 (P=0.02) and B1 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: CEA is an appropriate and safe procedure in elderly patients. Under consideration should be the performance of CEA in elderly patients with high preoperative RS.
机译:目的:颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)已被确立为治疗颈动脉疾病的有效方法。有争议的CEA在老年患者中的表现。这项研究的目的是报告有或没有同时进行主动脉冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的CEA术后75岁以上患者的中期(30天)神经系统预后。方法:纳入2000年1月至2007年12月的599例接受CEA的患者。在398/599(66%)患者(A组)中进行了独立的CEA。在201/599(34%)患者(B组)中进行了联合手术(CEA / CABG)。 A组(A1组)的90/398(23%)患者和B组(B1组)的49/201(24%)患者> 75岁。 A组(A2组)的308/398(77%)患者和B组(B2组)的152/201(76%)患者<75岁。报道了死亡率,TIA和中风发生率以及术前和术后Rankin量表(RS)。结果:在单独的CEA中,A1组的死亡率较高(A1:1.1%vs A2:0%,P = 0.51)。我们发现,TIA(A1:4.4%vs A2:3.2%,P = 0.79)或中风(A1:2.2%vs A2:1.9%,P = 0.98)的发生率无显着差异。在CEA / CABG中,B1组的死亡率为0%,B2组的死亡率为5.9%(P = 0.17)。 TIA(B1:2%vs B2:3%,P = 0.76)或中风率(B1:2%vs B2:5%,P = 0.70)没有显着差异。术前RS是A1组(P = 0.02)和B1组(P = 0.001)术后卒中的唯一阳性预测指标。结论:CEA是老年患者的一种适当而安全的手术。对于高术前RS的老年患者,应考虑CEA的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号