首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >CASE CONCERNING AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO {REPUBLIC OF GUINEA v DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
【24h】

CASE CONCERNING AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO {REPUBLIC OF GUINEA v DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO) PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS

机译:关于AHMADOU SADIO DIALLO(几内亚共和国诉刚果民主共和国)初步反对的理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although a number of significant issues remain to be resolved at the merits phase, the significance of the Court's judgment at the preliminary phase should not however be exaggerated. The Court itself noted that the role of diplomatic protection has largely faded since most issues relating to diplomatic protection of corporations and share-holding interests are now dealt with comprehensively in international treaties. One of the more regrettable features of the Barcelona Traction case is the very protracted nature of the litigation spanning several years before a judgment was delivered on the merits. This aspect of the Barcelona litigation has unfortunately not been corrected; it is now almost 10 years since Guinea instituted proceedings against the DRC and the Court is yet to deliver a judgment on the merits.
机译:尽管在案情实质阶段仍有许多重要问题有待解决,但不应夸大法院在初步阶段作出判决的重要性。法院本身指出,外交保护的作用已大大减弱,因为与公司和股权保护有关的大多数问题现已在国际条约中得到全面处理。巴塞罗那电车公司案最令人遗憾的特点之一是,诉讼的时间跨度很长,跨越了数年,才对案情作出判决。不幸的是,巴塞罗那诉讼的这一方面尚未得到纠正。几内亚对刚果民主共和国提起诉讼至今已近10年,法院尚未就案情作出判决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号