...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Transpulmonary pressure targets for open lung and protective ventilation: One size does not fit all
【24h】

Transpulmonary pressure targets for open lung and protective ventilation: One size does not fit all

机译:经肺压目标用于开放肺部和保护性通气:一种尺寸并不适合所有

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

More than 20 years ago Dreyfuss et al. and Hernandez et al. [1, 2] showed that ventilator-induced lung injury is better linked to transpulmo-nary pressure (P_L) than to airway pressure (P_(AW)). With this concept in mind Grasso et al. recently reported that using a P_L target, as opposed to a P_(AW) target, allowed them to use unconventionally high PEEP and end-inspiratory plateau pressure of the respiratory system (PPLAT_(RS)) in a subgroup of patients with ARDS associated with influenza A (H1N1) who were candidates for extracorpo-real membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to life-threatening refractory hypoxemia [3]. In patients with high chest wall elastance (E_(CW)), the application of higher PEEP and PPLAT_(RS) allowed by this approach provided sufficient lung recruitment to avert the need for ECMO. This proof-of-concept report compellingly shows the limitations of P_(AW) to gauge ventilatory settings in the context of high E_(CW).
机译:20多年前,Dreyfuss等人。和埃尔南德斯等。 [1,2]表明,呼吸机诱发的肺损伤与经肺压(P_L)的联系比与气道压力(P_(AW))的联系更好。考虑到这个概念,Grasso等人。最近报道称,与P_(AW)目标相反,使用P_L目标可以使他们在ARDS伴发性卒中患者亚组中使用非常规的高PEEP和呼吸系统终末吸气平台压(PPLAT_(RS))甲型流感(H1N1)由于威胁生命的难治性低氧血症而成为体外真实膜氧合(ECMO)的候选人[3]。对于具有高胸壁弹性(E_(CW))的患者,通过此方法允许使用较高的PEEP和PPLAT_(RS)可提供足够的肺募集,从而避免需要ECMO。该概念验证报告令人信服地显示了P_(AW)在高E_(CW)的情况下测量通气设置的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号