首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Analysis of resource use and cost-generating factors in a German medical intensive care unit employing the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28).
【24h】

Analysis of resource use and cost-generating factors in a German medical intensive care unit employing the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28).

机译:使用治疗干预评分系统(TISS-28)的德国医疗重症监护病房的资源使用和成本产生因素的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of resource use and costs of a medical intensive care unit (ICU) utilising the simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING:: Medical ICU of a tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with an ICU length of stay (LOS) more than 24 h. INTERVENTIONS: Over a 3 month period SAPS II, TISS-28 and SOFA were determined daily. Patients were retrospectively classified as receiving active (AT) or non-active (NAT) treatment according to TISS-28 variables, with AT representing a therapeutic intervention that could not be performed outside the ICU. Individual expenditure for all patients was calculated using a modified 'top-down' method. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Out of 303 consecutive patients, 241 (79.5%), including all non-survivors, were categorised AT. The hospital mortality was 14.5%. TISS-28 and ICU LOS were higher in patients receiving AT ( p<0.001). Patient-specific costs accounted for 36 EUR per TISS-point and daily treatment costs 1336 EUR for all patients. Daily costs of care were 68 EUR higher for AT, compared to NAT, patients ( p<0.001). There was no association between ICU costs and measures of severity of illness (SAPS II, SOFA). CONCLUSIONS: TISS-28 is a fast, reliable and readily applicable tool to identify patients receiving AT. Although total and daily costs of care were significantly higher in patients receiving AT, the difference of the daily costs was, albeit statistically significant, economically negligible. The main difference in ICU costs was attributable to ICU LOS. Therefore cost-saving strategies must aim at reducing ICU LOS, without compromising quality of care.
机译:目的:利用简化的治疗干预评分系统(TISS-28)评估重症监护病房(ICU)的资源使用和成本。设计:前瞻性观察研究。地点:三级护理中心的医疗ICU。患者:ICU住院时间(LOS)超过24小时的连续患者。干预措施:在3个月的时间内,每天测定一次SAPS II,TIS-28和SOFA。根据TISS-28变量将患者回顾性分类为接受主动(AT)或非主动(NAT)治疗,其中AT代表不能在ICU外进行的治疗性干预。使用改良的“自上而下”方法计算所有患者的个人支出。测量和结果:在303例连续患者中,包括所有非幸存者在内的241例(79.5%)被分类为AT。医院死亡率为14.5%。接受AT的患者中TISS-28和ICU LOS较高(p <0.001)。每个TISS点的患者特定费用为36欧元,所有患者的每日治疗费用为1336欧元。与NAT患者相比,AT患者的每日护理费用高出68欧元(p <0.001)。 ICU费用和疾病严重程度的衡量标准之间没有关联(SAPS II,SOFA)。结论:TISS-28是一种快速,可靠且易于应用的工具,用于识别接受AT的患者。尽管接受AT的患者的总护理费用和每日护理费用明显较高,但尽管有统计学意义,但每日费用的差异在经济上可以忽略不计。重症监护病房费用的主要差异是由于重症监护病房服务水平下降。因此,节省成本的策略必须旨在降低ICU LOS,同时又不影响护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号