...
首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution.
【24h】

Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution.

机译:通过单次经肺热稀释评估心脏预负荷和血管外肺水。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Transpulmonary double-indicator dilution is a useful monitoring technique for measurement of intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and extravascular lung water (EVLW). In this study, we compared a simpler approach using single arterial thermodilution derived measurements of ITBV and EVLW with the double-indicator dilution technique. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care units of two university hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) derived from single thermodilution was used for calculation of ITBV. Structural regression analysis of the first two thermo-dye dilution measurements in a derivation population of 57 critically ill patients (38 male, 19 female, 18-79 years, 56 +/- 15 years) revealed ITBV = (1.25 x GEDV)-28.4 (ml). This equation was then applied to all first measurements in a validation population of 209 critically ill patients (139 male, 70 female, 10-88 years, mean 53 +/- 19 years), and single-thermodilution ITBV (ITBV(ST)) and EVLW (EVLW(ST)) was calculated and compared to thermo-dye dilution derived values (ITBV(TD), EVLW(TD)). For inter-individual comparison, absolute values for ITBV and EVLW were normalised as indexed by body surface area (ITBVI) and body weight (EVLWI), respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Linear regression analysis yielded a correlation of ITBVI(ST) = (1.05 x ITBVI(TD))-58.0 (ml/m2), r = 0.97, P < 0.0001. Bias between ITBVI(TD) and ITBVI(ST) was 7.6 (ml/m2) with a standard deviation of 57.4 (ml/m2). Single-thermodilution EVLWI (EVLWI(ST)) was calculated using ITBVI(ST) and revealed the correlation EVLWI(ST) = (0.83 x EVLWI(TD)) + 1.6 (ml/kg), r = 0.96, P < 0.0001. Bias between EVLWI(TD) and EVLWI(ST) was -0.2 (ml/kg) with a standard deviation of 1.4 (ml/kg). In detail, EVLWI(ST) systematically overestimated EVLWI(TD) at low-normal values for EVLWI and underestimated EVLWI at higher values (above 12 ml/kg). CONCLUSION: Determinations of ITBV and EVLW by single thermodilution agreed closely with the corresponding values from the double-indicator technique. Since transpulmonary single thermodilution is simple to apply, less invasive and cheaper, all these features make it a promising technique for the bedside. Nevertheless, further validation studies are needed in the future.
机译:目的:经肺双指标稀释是一种有效的监测技术,可用于测量胸腔内血量(ITBV)和血管外肺水(EVLW)。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用单动脉热稀释法得出的ITBV和EVLW与双指标稀释技术的比较简单方法。设计:前瞻性观察性临床研究。地点:两家大学医院的外科重症监护室。病人和方法:将单次热稀释得到的总舒张末期容积(GEDV)用于ITBV的计算。对57位危重患者(38例男性,19例女性,18-79岁,56 +/- 15岁)的派生人群中前两次热染料稀释度测量的结构回归分析显示ITBV =(1.25 x GEDV)-28.4 (毫升)。然后将该方程式应用于209名危重患者的验证人群中的所有首次测量(男性139例,女性70例,10-88岁,平均53 +/- 19岁),以及单热稀释ITBV(ITBV(ST))计算EVLW(EVLW(ST)),并将其与热染料稀释度衍生值(ITBV(TD),EVLW(TD))进行比较。为了进行个体间比较,将ITBV和EVLW的绝对值分别按体表面积(ITBVI)和体重(EVLWI)进行归一化。测量和结果:线性回归分析得出ITBVI(ST)=(1.05 x ITBVI(TD))-58.0(ml / m2)的相关性,r = 0.97,P <0.0001。 ITBVI(TD)和ITBVI(ST)之间的偏差为7.6(ml / m2),标准偏差为57.4(ml / m2)。使用ITBVI(ST)计算单次热解法EVLWI(EVLWI(ST))并显示出相关性EVLWI(ST)=(0.83 x EVLWI(TD))+ 1.6(ml / kg),r = 0.96,P <0.0001。 EVLWI(TD)和EVLWI(ST)之间的偏差为-0.2(ml / kg),标准偏差为1.4(ml / kg)。详细而言,EVLWI(ST)在EVLWI的正常值较低时系统性地高估了EVLWI(TD),而在较高值(12 ml / kg以上)时低估了EVLWI(TD)。结论:单次热稀释法测定ITBV和EVLW与双指示剂技术的相应值非常吻合。由于经肺单一热稀释法易于应用,侵入性较小且价格便宜,所有这些功能使其成为床边技术的有希望的技术。尽管如此,将来仍需要进一步的验证研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号