首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally-based targeting device techniques.
【24h】

Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally-based targeting device techniques.

机译:胫骨髓内钉远端互锁螺钉放置:徒手定位和远端定位技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intramedullary nailing is the standard treatment for closed and some open unstable diaphyseal tibia fractures. Fluoroscopy, while essential for proper nail placement can subject the surgical team and patient to substantial radiation. A new targeting system for tibia nail distal interlocking was developed by Orthofix((R)) to limit fluoroscopy. This prospective clinical study compares the Orthofix((R)) targeting system versus a free-hand technique for the tibial nail distal interlocking. Fifty eight consecutive patients with sixty tibial fractures amenable for nail fixation were randomly assigned into two equal groups: Group 1: Orthofix((R)) distally based distal targeting device and Group 2: a free-hand technique. In all the cases stabilization was achieved with a reamed statically locked tibial nail. Recorded data included accuracy of screw placement, duration of surgery prior to and during distal interlocking, and the fluoroscopy time prior to and during distal interlocking. Both groups revealed comparable fracture patterns. In all fractures the technical aspects of the surgical treatment were performed without complications. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the mean time of surgery prior to (62.02 vs. 61.01 min, P=0.92) and during distal interlocking (17.06 vs. 19.08 min, P=0.55), or in the total surgical time (81 vs. 85 min), respectively. Neither was there a statistically significant difference in the mean fluoroscopy time prior to distal interlocking (69 vs. 81 s, p=0.22) nor in the total fluoroscopy time (84 vs. 117 s). There was however, a statistically significant difference between the Orthofix and free-hand groups with regards to the mean fluoroscopy time during distal interlocking (15 vs. 36 s, P=0.01, respectively). This study demonstrates that the distally based distal targeting device by Orthofix((R)) for tibial nailing can significantly decrease the mean fluoroscopy time necessary to complete distal interlocking versus free-hand technique.
机译:髓内钉治疗闭合性和开放性不稳定骨干胫骨骨折的标准治疗方法。荧光检查虽然对正确放置指甲至关重要,但可以使手术团队和患者承受大量辐射。 Orthofix(R)开发了一种新的用于胫骨钉远端锁定的靶向系统,以限制透视。这项前瞻性临床研究将Orthofix(R)靶向系统与徒手技术用于胫骨钉远端互锁进行了比较。将58例适合钉子固定的60例胫骨骨折患者随机分为两组:第一组:基于远端的Orthofix(R)远端靶向装置;第二组:徒手技术。在所有情况下,使用扩孔的静态锁定胫骨钉即可达到稳定。记录的数据包括螺钉放置的准确性,远端联锁之前和期间的手术时间以及远端联锁之前和期间的透视时间。两组均显示出可比较的骨折模式。在所有骨折中,手术治疗的技术方面均无并发症。在术前平均手术时间(62.02 vs. 61.01 min,P = 0.92)和远端互锁期间(17.06 vs. 19.08 min,P = 0.55)或总手术时间之间,各组之间无统计学差异。 (分别是81分钟和85分钟)。远端互锁前的平均透视时间(69 vs. 81 s,p = 0.22)和总透视时间(84 vs. 117 s)均无统计学意义。但是,就远侧联锁期间而言,Orthofix组和徒手组之间的平均透视时间之间存在统计学上的显着差异(分别为15 s对36 s,P = 0.01)。这项研究表明,Orthofix(R)用于胫骨钉的远端远侧靶向装置可以显着减少完成远端互锁与徒手技术所需的平均荧光检查时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号