首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Primary closure versus non-closure of dog bite wounds. A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Primary closure versus non-closure of dog bite wounds. A randomised controlled trial

机译:犬咬伤伤口的初次闭合与非闭合。随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Dog bite wounds represent a major health problem. Despite their importance, their management and especially the role of primary closure remain controversial. In this randomised controlled trial, the outcome between primary suturing and non-closure was compared. Methods 168 consecutive patients with dog bite injuries were included in this study. The wounds were allocated randomly in two treatment approaches: Group 1, consisting of eighty-two patients, had their wound sutured, whilst Group 2, consisting of eighty-six patients, did not have their wounds sutured. All wounds were cleansed using high-pressure irrigation and povidone iodine. All patients received the same type of antibiotic treatment. Our measured outcomes included presence of infection and cosmetic appearance. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Wound and patient characteristics, such as time of management, wound location and size, and patient age, were recorded and analysed for their potential role in the resulting outcome. Results The overall infection rate was 8.3%. No difference in the infection rate between primary suturing and non-suturing group was detected in the present study. The cosmetic appearance of the sutured wounds was significantly better (mean score 1.74) compared to the wounds that were left open (mean score 3.05) (p = 0.0001). The infection rate was comparable among all age groups. Wounds treated within 8 h of injury demonstrated an infection rate of 4.5%, which is lower compared to the 22.2% rate observed in wounds treated later than 8 h. The wounds located at the head and neck exhibited better results in both infection rate and cosmetic outcome. Additionally, wounds >3 cm negatively affected the cosmetic appearance of the outcome. Conclusions Primary suturing of wounds caused by dog bites resulted in similar infection rate compared to non-suturing. However, primary suturing exhibited improved cosmetic appearance. Time of management appeared to be critical, as early treatment resulted in lower infection rate and improved cosmetic appearance regardless suturing or not. Furthermore, wounds located at the head and face demonstrated better results.
机译:简介狗咬伤是一个主要的健康问题。尽管它们很重要,但是它们的管理,尤其是初级关闭的作用仍然存在争议。在这项随机对照试验中,比较了初次缝合和不缝合之间的结果。方法连续168例被狗咬伤的患者纳入本研究。伤口是通过两种治疗方法随机分配的:第1组由82位患者组成,他们的伤口被缝合,而第2组由86位患者组成,没有伤口。使用高压冲洗和聚维酮碘清洁所有伤口。所有患者均接受相同类型的抗生素治疗。我们测量的结果包括感染的存在和外观。使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评估美容效果。记录伤口和患者特征,例如处理时间,伤口位置和大小以及患者年龄,并分析其在结果中的潜在作用。结果总感染率为8.3%。在本研究中未发现初次缝合组和非缝合组之间的感染率差异。与留空的伤口(平均评分3.05)相比,缝合伤口的外观明显更好(平均评分1.74)(p = 0.0001)。所有年龄段的感染率均相当。在受伤8小时内治疗的伤口显示出4.5%的感染率,低于在8小时后伤口中观察到的22.2%的感染率。位于头部和颈部的伤口在感染率和美容效果上均表现出更好的效果。此外,> 3 cm的伤口会对结局的美容外观产生负面影响。结论犬咬伤引起的伤口初步缝合与未缝合相比感染率相似。但是,一次缝合表现出改善的外观。处理时间似乎很关键,因为无论是否缝合,早期治疗均会降低感染率并改善外观。此外,位于头部和面部的伤口表现出更好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号