...
首页> 外文期刊>Integrative cancer therapies >Controversies in cancer screening: focusing on colorectal cancer recommendations.
【24h】

Controversies in cancer screening: focusing on colorectal cancer recommendations.

机译:癌症筛查的争议:侧重于结直肠癌的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Screening recommendations for common malignancies, such as cervical, breast, and prostate cancer, have been questioned in the past year, and vigorous professional, public, and private debates have ensued. For breast cancer screening, mammography recommendations have been rethought, most notably by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.1 Their recommendations support the use of mammography, but changes have been suggested regarding the ages to begin and end screening, as well as the frequency of the screening studies. Whereas for breast cancer very few have questioned a benefit of mammography in the appropriate population and situation (however, for opposing viewpoints, see Zahl et al), the case is different regarding prostate cancer screening. The use of prostate-specific antigen as a screening tool has been studied and found to be of questionable benefit. In certain clinical situations it might even lead to more harm than benefit.
机译:在过去的一年中,对常见恶性肿瘤(例如子宫颈癌,乳腺癌和前列腺癌)的筛查建议受到了质疑,随之而来的是专业,公共和私人领域的激烈争论。对于乳腺癌筛查,已经重新考虑了乳房X线摄影的建议,特别是美国预防服务工作队。1他们的建议支持使用乳房X线摄影,但是对于开始和结束筛查的年龄以及检查的频率提出了建议。筛选研究。对于乳腺癌,很少有人质疑在合适的人群和情况下进行乳房X线照相术的好处(但是,对于相反的观点,请参见Zahl等人),但前列腺癌筛查的情况则有所不同。已经研究了使用前列腺特异性抗原作为筛选工具,并且发现其益处令人怀疑。在某些临床情况下,甚至可能导致弊大于利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号