...
首页> 外文期刊>InTech >Speed manages streams
【24h】

Speed manages streams

机译:速度管理流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The case for variable frequency drives as a final control element spreads. The concept of using variable frequency drives to control electric-driven centrifugal pumps is distinguished. But they seldom work in the petroleum industry. Why? The reasons given range from misinformed economic data and an unease of using unfamiliar electrical technology to an ignorance of how these devices react as control devices. One still sees the majority of flow, pressure, and temperature control happening through constant-speed centrifugal machines that a control valve throttles to provide the desired control of fluids. The use of variable frequency (VF) drives—adjustable frequency drives or variable speed (VS) drives—on electric motors driving centrifugal pumps offers many advantages over using control valves for controlling the fluid flow. Some of the advantages are energy savings, efficiency, power factor, installation, specification, ability to control, maintenance, fugitive emissions, and reduced wear on the bearings and seals of the pumps. Although this method of control has gained wide acceptance in general industry, there is still reluctance to use it in the petroleum industry. The reasons for this vary, but the most common reasons are: (1) a lack of understanding about how these devices work in comparison to the more commonly used control valve (2) a common misconception that these devices are expensive compared to control valves (3) a reluctance to use these devices on explosionproof motors found in petroleum facilities (4) a fear of the reliability of these fundamentally electronic devices (5) a lack of knowledge about the failure modes of these devices for the hazard and operability analysis There is no doubt that in the early days of development of the variable frequency drive some of the issues were true. However, over time the cost, reliability, functionality, and knowledge of these devices has improved to a point where we believe they should be viable final control elements for petroleum facilities.
机译:变频驱动器作为最终控制元件的情况正在蔓延。区别在于使用变频驱动器来控制电动离心泵的概念。但是他们很少在石油工业中工作。为什么?给出的原因包括错误的经济数据和对使用不熟悉的电气技术的不安,以及对这些设备作为控制设备的反应一无所知。人们仍然看到通过定速离心机进行的大部分流量,压力和温度控制,控制阀可以通过节流阀来提供所需的流体控制。与使用控制阀控制流体流量相比,在驱动离心泵的电动机上使用变频驱动器(变频驱动器或变速驱动器)具有许多优势。其中的一些优势是节能,效率,功率因数,安装,规格,控制,维护,无用排放以及减少泵的轴承和密封件的磨损。尽管这种控制方法已在一般工业中得到广泛认可,但仍不愿意在石油工业中使用它。造成这种情况的原因各不相同,但最常见的原因是:(1)与更常用的控制阀相比,这些设备的工作方式缺乏了解;(2)一种普遍的误解是,与控制阀相比,这些设备价格昂贵( 3)不愿意在石油设施中使用的防爆电机上使用这些设备(4)担心这些基本的电子设备的可靠性(5)缺乏对这些设备的故障模式进行危害和可操作性分析的知识毫无疑问,在变频驱动器的发展初期,确实存在一些问题。但是,随着时间的流逝,这些设备的成本,可靠性,功能和知识已经提高到一定程度,我们认为它们应该是石油设施可行的最终控制元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号