首页> 外文期刊>Insectes Sociaux: Bulletin de l'Union Internationale pour l'Etude des Insectes Sociaux >Leaf-cutting ants as road engineers: the width of trails at branching points in Atta cephalotes.
【24h】

Leaf-cutting ants as road engineers: the width of trails at branching points in Atta cephalotes.

机译:切叶蚁,道路工程师:Atta cephalotes的分支点处的步道宽度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We used a simple engineering principle, which suggests that the width of a road needed for a smooth traffic flow is proportional to the peak traffic volume ("engineering hypothesis"), to analyze the adaptive significance of trail width at branching points in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Since the flow of outgoing ants splits at trail bifurcations and merges when ants return to the nest through the same paths, the sum of branch widths should equal the width of the trail section upstream of the bifurcation. We measured the width of branches and their preceding trail section and also performed field measurements and manipulations to analyze ant flow, number of collisions, and ant speed in different trail sectors. Contrary to the prediction of the "engineering hypothesis", the sum of branch widths was larger than the width of the trail immediately before the bifurcation. Our data contradict the "trail addition hypothesis" and support the "border effect hypothesis" to explain this pattern. First, the width of the widest branch was smaller than the width of the trail upstream of the bifurcation, an unexpected result if one branch is merely the continuation of the basal trail. Second, ants collided with obstacles more often in the margin than in the central portion of the trail, relocated ants from central to margin trail sectors reduced their speed, and ant flow was higher in the central sections of the trail. Since the delaying effect of trail margins increases as the trail width decreases, ants may build branches wider than expected to reduce the border effect. The delaying effect of trail margins should be included in the analysis of costs and benefits to fully understand the adaptive value of the design of ant trail networks.
机译:我们使用了一种简单的工程原理,该原理表明,为使​​交通顺畅所需的道路宽度与交通高峰流量成正比(“工程假设”),从而分析了叶子的分支点处步道宽度的自适应意义。切蚂蚁阿塔头足类。由于流出的蚂蚁流在路径分叉处分裂,并在蚂蚁通过相同路径返回巢穴时合并,因此分支宽度的总和应等于分叉上游路径段的宽度。我们测量了分支的宽度以及它们之前的尾迹部分,并且还进行了现场测量和操作,以分析不同尾迹扇区中的蚂蚁流动,碰撞次数和蚂蚁速度。与“工程假设”的预测相反,分支宽度的总和大于紧接在分叉之前的路径的宽度。我们的数据与“线索加法假设”相矛盾,并支持“边界效应假设”来解释这种模式。首先,最宽分支的宽度小于分叉上游路径的宽度,如果一个分支仅仅是基部路径的延续,则出乎意料的结果。其次,蚂蚁在障碍物边缘的碰撞要比在径迹的中央部分更频繁,蚂蚁从中央径迹边缘转移到边缘径迹的扇区降低了它们的速度,并且在径迹的中央部分的蚂蚁流量更高。由于尾迹边距的延迟效应会随着尾迹宽度的减小而增加,因此蚂蚁可能会建立比预期宽的分支,以减少边界效应。路径裕度的延迟效应应包括在成本和收益分析中,以充分了解蚂蚁路径网络设计的适应性价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号