首页> 外文期刊>Innovations: technology and techniques in cardiothoracic and vascular surgery >Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Octogenarian Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared With On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
【24h】

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Octogenarian Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared With On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

机译:与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,接受非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的老年患者的短期和长期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CAB) on elderly patients presenting with multivessel coronary artery disease has become routine in modem day operating rooms. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes in octogenarian patients undergoing off-pump CAB (OPCAB) versus on-pump CAB (ONCAB).Methods: A propensity-adjusted, retrospective review of patients older than 80 years who underwent primary CAB from January 1996 to September 2008 at our institution's hospitals was performed. Nine hundred thirty-seven patients were divided into two groups: OPCAB (n = 540) or ONCAB (n = 397). A propensity score was calculated based on 29 preoperative risk factors to adjust for selection bias when comparing the groups for differences in death, stroke, myo-cardial infarction incidence, and their composite (major adverse cardiac events). Long-term survival status was determined by cross-referencing patient records with the Social Security Death Index. Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to determine group differences in short- and long-term survival, respectively, adjusted for the propensity score. Kaplan-Meier curves were fit to estimate 10-year survival. Results: The mean age (OPCAB: 82.9 +- 2.8 years vs ONCAB: 82.3 +- 2.4, P = 0.003) and male sex (OPCAB: 292/540, 54.1% vs ONCAB: 220/397, 55.4%, P = 0.68) were clinically similar between groups. Although the ejection fraction (OPCAB: 52.1 +-12.5% vs ONCAB: 50.6 +- 13.1, P = 0.10) were similar between groups, the mean number of distal anastomoses [OPCAB: 2.7 +-1.0 (median 3) vs ONCAB: 3.4 +- 0.9 (median 3), P < 0.001] were less in the OPCAB group. The median postoperative length of stay was 7 days for OPCAB group and 6 for the ONCAB group (P = 0.31). The Society of Thoracic Surgery predicted risk of in-hospital mortality was similar for OPCAB (5.4%) and ONCAB (5.3%) patients (P = 0.81). However, observed in-hospital mortality was improved for patients in the OPC...
机译:目的:在现代手术室中,患有多支冠状动脉疾病的老年患者进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CAB)已成为常规。我们的研究目的是比较接受非体外循环CAB(OPCAB)与非体外循环CAB(ONCAB)的八龄患者的短期和长期结果。方法:对年龄超过80岁的患者进行倾向性调整回顾性回顾。他们于1996年1月至2008年9月在我们机构的医院接受了原发性CAB治疗。 937例患者分为两组:OPCAB(n = 540)或ONCAB(n = 397)。在比较各组的死亡,中风,心肌梗塞发生率及其复合(主要不良心脏事件)差异时,根据29个术前危险因素计算倾向得分,以调整选择偏倚。通过将患者记录与社会保障死亡指数进行交叉引用来确定长期生存状态。使用Logistic回归分析和Cox比例风险分析分别确定短期和长期生存率的组差异,并根据倾向得分进行调整。 Kaplan-Meier曲线适合估计10年生存期。结果:平均年龄(OPCAB:82.9±2.8岁vs ONCAB:82.3±2.4,P = 0.003)和男性性别(OPCAB:292/540,54.1%vs ONCAB:220/397,55.4%,P = 0.68 )在各组之间临床相似。尽管两组之间的射血分数(OPCAB:52.1 + -12.5%,ONCAB:50.6 +-13.1,P = 0.10)相似,但远端吻合的平均数[OPCAB:2.7 + -1.0(中位数3)与ONCAB:3.4在OPCAB组中,±0.9(中位数3),P <0.001]较少。 OPCAB组术后中位住院时间为7天,ONCAB组为6天(P = 0.31)。胸外科协会预测,OPCAB(5.4%)和ONCAB(5.3%)患者的院内死亡风险相似(P = 0.81)。但是,OPC患者的住院死亡率得到了改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号