...
首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Knowledge of Fecal Calprotectin and Infliximab Trough Levels Alters Clinical Decision-making for IBD Outpatients on Maintenance Infliximab Therapy
【24h】

Knowledge of Fecal Calprotectin and Infliximab Trough Levels Alters Clinical Decision-making for IBD Outpatients on Maintenance Infliximab Therapy

机译:粪便钙卫蛋白和英夫利昔单抗谷水平的知识改变了维持英夫利昔单抗治疗的IBD门诊患者的临床决策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:Infliximab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, more than 50% of patients lose response. Empiric dose intensification is not effective for all patients because not all patients have objective disease activity or subtherapeutic drug level. The aim was to determine how an objective marker of disease activity or therapeutic drug monitoring affects clinical decisions regarding maintenance infliximab therapy in outpatients with IBD.Methods:Consecutive patients with IBD on maintenance infliximab therapy were invited to participate by providing preinfusion stool and blood samples. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) and infliximab trough levels (ITLs) were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Three decisions were compared: (1) actual clinical decision, (2) algorithmic FCP or ITL decisions, and (3) expert panel decision based on (a) clinical data, (b) clinical data plus FCP, and (c) clinical data plus FCP plus ITL. In secondary analysis, Receiver-operating curves were used to assess the ability of FCP and ITL in predicting clinical disease activity or remission.Results:A total of 36 sets of blood and stool were available for analysis; median FCP 191.5 g/g, median ITLs 7.3 g/mL. The actual clinical decision differed from the hypothetical decision in 47.2% (FCP algorithm); 69.4% (ITL algorithm); 25.0% (expert panel clinical decision); 44.4% (expert panel clinical plus FCP); 58.3% (expert panel clinical plus FCP plus ITL) cases. FCP predicted clinical relapse (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.417; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.197-0.641) and subtherapeutic ITL (AUC = 0.774; 95% CI, 0.536-1.000). ITL predicted clinical remission (AUC = 0.498; 95% CI, 0.254-0.742) and objective remission (AUC = 0.773; 95% CI, 0.622-0.924).Conclusions:Using FCP and ITLs in addition to clinical data results in an increased number of decisions to optimize management in outpatients with IBD on stable maintenance infliximab therapy.
机译:背景:英夫利昔单抗是治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的有效方法。但是,超过50%的患者会失去反应。经验性剂量强化并非对所有患者都有效,因为并非所有患者都有客观的疾病活动或亚治疗药物水平。目的是确定疾病活动性或治疗药物监测的客观标志如何影响IBD门诊患者维持英夫利昔单抗治疗的临床决策。方法:邀请连续接受维持英夫利昔单抗治疗的IBD患者,提供输注前的粪便和血液样本。粪便钙卫蛋白(FCP)和英夫利昔单抗谷水平(ITLs)通过酶联免疫吸附法测定。比较了三个决策:(1)实际临床决策,(2)算法FCP或ITL决策,以及(3)基于(a)临床数据,(b)临床数据加FCP和(c)临床数据的专家小组决策加上FCP加上ITL。在次要分析中,使用接收器操作曲线评估FCP和ITL预测临床疾病活动或缓解的能力。结果:共有36组血液和粪便可供分析; FCP中位数为191.5 g / g,ITL中位数为7.3 g / mL。实际临床决策与假设决策的差异为47.2%(FCP算法); 69.4%(ITL算法); 25.0%(专家小组临床决策); 44.4%(专家小组临床加FCP); 58.3%(专家组临床加FCP加ITL)病例。 FCP预测临床复发(曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.417; 95%置信区间[CI],0.197-0.641)和亚治疗性ITL(AUC = 0.774; 95%CI,0.536-1.000)。 ITL预测临床缓解(AUC = 0.498; 95%CI,0.254-0.742)和客观缓解(AUC = 0.773; 95%CI,0.622-0.924)。结论:除了临床数据外,使用FCP和ITL导致数量增加稳定维持英夫利昔单抗治疗的IBD门诊患者最佳管理决策的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号