首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Clinical indications of the use of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease at an Academic Medical Center.
【24h】

Clinical indications of the use of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease at an Academic Medical Center.

机译:在学术医学中心评估抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体和抗酿酒酵母抗体在炎性肠病评估中的临床适应症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Serological markers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), have a high specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing IBD. However, neither indication nor use in clinical practice has been clearly established. This study aimed to determine the clinical impact of ANCA/ASCA testing by evaluating how these tests were used in an academic referral center. METHODS: Retrospective chart review to classify the indications for testing and effect on diagnosis or management. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients had serological tests for IBD. Indications included differentiating ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) in established patients with IBD (13%); establishing a diagnosis in patients with atypical signs of inflammation as detected by endoscopy, histology, or radiology (50%); evaluation of chronic diarrhea (22%); evaluation of a family history of IBD (4%); and differentiating pouchitis from CD (4%). Review of the subsequent course indicated that serologic testing had an important role in diagnosis in 28% of patients, a supportive role in 26%, and was not helpful in 46%. Serologic testing clarified the clinical presentation in 61% of those presenting with atypical inflammatory changes. It proved valuable in establishing a diagnosis of UC or CD in a subset of middle-aged patients with inflammatory changes in the sigmoid colon. For patients with chronic diarrhea, the yield was lower: 36% had a significant effect on diagnosis, but test results changed immediate treatment in only 1 (6%). In patients being considered for operative management (n = 8), serologic testing was valuable in clarifying the diagnosis in 75% of patients and had an impact on the operative plan in 62% of patients. CONCLUSION: Serological testing for ANCA/ASCA may have a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment in individuals presenting with sigmoid inflammation or atypical inflammation but was less useful inthose with chronic diarrhea.
机译:背景:炎性肠病(IBD)的血清学标志物,包括抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)和抗酿酒酵母抗体(ASCA),在诊断IBD方面具有很高的特异性和积极的预测价值。但是,尚未明确建立适应症或在临床实践中的用途。本研究旨在通过评估学术推荐中心如何使用ANCA / ASCA测试来确定其临床影响。方法:回顾性图表审查对测试的适应症以及对诊断或管理的影响进行分类。结果:76例患者接受了IBD血清学检查。适应症包括在已确定的IBD患者中将溃疡性结肠炎(UC)与克罗恩病(CD)区分开(13%);通过内窥镜检查,组织学检查或放射学检查发现患有非典型炎症迹象的患者(50%);慢性腹泻的评估(22%);评估IBD家族史(4%);并区分CD和袋囊炎(4%)。对后续课程的回顾表明,血清学检测在诊断28%的患者中具有重要作用,在26%的患者中具有支持作用,而在46%的患者中无帮助。血清学检查明确了非典型炎症变化的61%的临床表现。它被证明对于在乙状结肠炎性变化的中年患者亚组中诊断UC或CD具有重要意义。对于慢性腹泻患者,产率较低:36%对诊断有显着影响,但测试结果仅改变了立即治疗(1%)。在考虑进行手术治疗的患者中(n = 8),血清学检查对于澄清75%的患者的诊断非常有价值,并且对62%的患者的手术计划有影响。结论:对于患有乙状结肠炎或非典型炎症的个体,ANCA / ASCA血清学检测可能在诊断和治疗中起着重要作用,但对于慢性腹泻患者则没有多大作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号