首页> 外文期刊>Inflammatory bowel diseases >Small intestine contrast ultrasonography: an alternative to radiology in the assessment of small bowel disease.
【24h】

Small intestine contrast ultrasonography: an alternative to radiology in the assessment of small bowel disease.

机译:小肠造影超声:小肠疾病评估中放射学的替代方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Radiology and transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) are used in the evaluation of the small bowel; however, the former technique is limited by radiation exposure, and the latter by its inability to visualize the entire small bowel. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) to assess the presence, number, site, and extension of small bowel lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: TUS, SICUS, and small bowel follow-through (SBFT) were performed in 148 consecutive patients (78 women; age range, 12 to 89 yr), 91 with undiagnosed conditions, and 57 with previously diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD). RESULTS: In the undiagnosed patients, the sensitivity and specificity of TUS and SICUS were 57% and 100%, and 94.3% and 98%, respectively. In the CD patients, the sensitivity of TUS and SICUS was 87.3% and 98%, respectively. In comparison with SBFT, the extension of lesions was correctly assessed with SICUS and greatly underestimated with TUS. The concordance indexbetween SBFT and SICUS for the number and site of lesions was 1 and 1 (P < 0.001), respectively, in undiagnosed patients, and 0.81 and 0.83 (P < 0.001), respectively, in CD patients. Between SBFT and TUS, the concordance index was 0.28 and 0.27 (not significant), respectively, in undiagnosed patients, and 0.28 and 0.31 (not significant), respectively, in CD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of SICUS is comparable to that of a radiologic examination, and is superior to that of TUS in detecting the presence, number, extension, and sites of small bowel lesions. These findings support the use of noninvasive SICUS for an initial investigation when small bowel disease is suspected and in the follow-up of CD patients.
机译:背景:放射学和经腹超声检查(TUS)被用于评估小肠。但是,前一种技术受到辐射暴露的限制,而后者则由于无法可视化整个小肠而受到限制。目的:评估小肠造影超声(SICUS)的诊断准确性,以评估小肠病变的存在,数量,部位和范围。研究对象和方法:连续148例患者(78名妇女;年龄在12至89岁),91例未确诊的病患和57例先前被诊断为克罗恩病(CD)的患者接受了TUS,SICUS和小肠随访(SBFT)。 )。结果:在未诊断的患者中,TUS和SICUS的敏感性和特异性分别为57%和100%,以及94.3%和98%。在CD患者中,TUS和SICUS的敏感性分别为87.3%和98%。与SBFT相比,用SICUS正确评估了病变的扩展,而TUS则大大低估了病变的扩展。 SBFT和SICUS之间的病灶数目和部位的一致性指数在未诊断的患者中分别为1和1(P <0.001),在CD患者中分别为0.81和0.83(P <0.001)。在SBFT和TUS之间,未诊断患者的一致性指数分别为0.28和0.27(不显着),而CD患者的一致性指数分别为0.28和0.31(不显着)。结论:SICUS的诊断准确性可与放射学检查相媲美,并且在检测小肠病变的存在,数目,扩展和部位方面优于TUS。这些发现支持在怀疑有小肠疾病时以及在CD患者的随访中,将无创SICUS用于初步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号