首页> 外文期刊>Infection control and hospital epidemiology >Comparison of Clinical Severity Score Indices for Clostridium difficile Infection.
【24h】

Comparison of Clinical Severity Score Indices for Clostridium difficile Infection.

机译:艰难梭菌感染的临床严重程度评分指标的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. To compare 8 severity score indices for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Design. Prospective observational study. Methods. This study was conducted from July through October 2006. All hospitalized patients in 3 university-affiliated hospitals with a positive fecal Clostridium difficile toxin assay result were evaluated. Infection was considered severe if patients had at least 1 of the following clinical events during their hospitalization: (1) death attributed to CDI within 30 days after diagnosis, (2) colectomy necessitated by CDI, or (3) intensive care unit admission for management of complications attributed to CDI. Severity was assessed on the basis of 8 severity score indices, using published criteria for severe CDI as the benchmark. The 8 severity score indices studied were Beth Israel, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center version 1, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center version 2, Hines VA, modified University of Illinois, University of Calgary version 1, University of Calgary version 2, and University of Temple. Results. Of 184 patients with CDI evaluated, 19 had severe cases and 165 had nonsevere cases, as assessed on the basis of the defined severe CDI criteria. Sensitivities of the 8 severity score indices studied ranged from 63.2% to 84.2%, and specificities ranged from 59.4% to 93.9%. The Hines VA index had the highest kappa score (0.69 [95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.83]), followed by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center version 1 index. Independent risk factors for severe CDI determined by multivariate analysis were abdominal distention ([Formula: see text]), fever (temperature, 38.0 degrees C or above; [Formula: see text]), white blood cell count of at least 20,000 cells/mm(3) ([Formula: see text]), and hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin level less than 3 mg/dL; [Formula: see text]). Conclusion. The Hines VA CDI severity score index appeared to display the strongest correlation for predicting more severe forms of CDI.
机译:目的。为了比较艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的8个严重程度得分指数。设计。前瞻性观察研究。方法。该研究于2006年7月至2006年10月进行。对3所大学附属医院的所有住院患者粪便艰难梭菌毒素检测结果均为阳性进行了评估。如果患者在住院期间至少发生以下一种临床事件,则认为感染严重:(1)诊断后30天内归因于CDI的死亡,(2)CDI导致的结肠切除术,或(3)接受重症监护病房管理归因于CDI的并发症。严重性是根据8个严重性得分指数进行评估的,并使用已发布的严重CDI标准作为基准。研究的8个严重程度得分指数是Beth Israel,匹兹堡大学医学中心版本1,匹兹堡大学医学中心版本2,Hines VA,改良的伊利诺伊大学,卡尔加里大学版本1,卡尔加里大学版本2和坦普尔大学。结果。根据定义的严重CDI标准评估的184例CDI患者中,有19例为严重病例,有165例为非严重病例。研究的8个严重程度得分指数的敏感度范围为63.2%至84.2%,特异性的范围为59.4%至93.9%。 Hines VA指数的kappa得分最高(0.69 [95%置信区间,0.54-0.83]),其次是匹兹堡大学医学中心1版指数。通过多变量分析确定的严重CDI的独立危险因素是腹胀([公式:参见文字]),发烧(温度38.0摄氏度或更高; [公式:参见文字]),白细胞计数至少20,000个细胞/ mm(3)([公式:参见文字])和低白蛋白血症(血清白蛋白水平低于3 mg / dL; [公式:参见文字])。结论。 Hines VA CDI严重程度评分指数似乎显示出最强的相关性,以预测更严重的CDI形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号