首页> 外文期刊>Infection >Efficacy and safety of IV/PO moxifloxacin and IV piperacillin/tazobactam followed by PO amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of diabetic foot infections: Results of the RELIEF study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of IV/PO moxifloxacin and IV piperacillin/tazobactam followed by PO amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of diabetic foot infections: Results of the RELIEF study

机译:IV / PO莫西沙星和IV哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,PO阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗糖尿病足感染的有效性和安全性:RELIEF研究结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of two antibiotic regimens in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Methods: Data of a subset of patients enrolled in the RELIEF trial with DFIs requiring surgery and antibiotics were evaluated retrospectively. DFI was diagnosed on the basis of the modified Wagner, University of Texas, and PEDIS classification systems. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous/oral moxifloxacin (MXF, N = 110) 400 mg q.d. or intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam 4.0/0.5 g t.d.s. followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125 mg b.d. (PIP/TAZ-AMC, N = 96), for 7-21 days until the end of treatment (EOT). The primary endpoint was clinical cure rates in the per-protocol (PP) population at the test-of-cure visit (TOC, 14-28 days after EOT). Results: There were no significant differences between the demographic characteristics of PP patients in either treatment group. At TOC, MXF and PIP/TAZ-AMC had similar efficacy in both the PP and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations: MXF: 76.4 % versus PIP/TAZ-AMC: 78.1 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI) -14.5 %, 9.0 % in the PP population; MXF: 69.9 % versus PIP/TAZ-AMC: 69.1 %; 95 % CI -12.4 %, 12.1 % in the ITT population. The overall bacteriological success rates were similar in both treatment groups (MXF: 71.7 % versus PIP/TAZ-AMC: 71.8 %; 95 % CI -16.9 %, 10.7 %). A similar proportion of patients (ITT population) experienced any adverse events in both treatment groups (MXF: 30.9 % versus PIP/TAZ-AMC: 31.8 %, respectively). Death occurred in three MXF-treated patients and one PIP/TAZ-AMC-treated patient; these were unrelated to the study drugs. Conclusion: Moxifloxacin has shown favorable safety and efficacy profiles in DFI patients and could be an alternative antibiotic therapy in the management of DFI. Clinical trial: NCT00402727.
机译:目的:目的是比较两种抗生素方案在糖尿病足感染(DFI)患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性评估了参与RELIEF试验且需要手术和抗生素的DFI的一部分患者的数据。 DFI是根据改良的Wagner,德克萨斯大学和PEDIS分类系统诊断的。患者随机接受静脉/口服莫西沙星(MXF,N = 110)400 mgq.d。或静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.0 / 0.5 g t.d.s.然后口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸875/125 mg b.d. (PIP / TAZ-AMC,N = 96),持续7-21天,直到治疗结束(EOT)。主要终点是在每次就诊(TOC,EOT后14-28天)的按方案(PP)人群中的临床治愈率。结果:在两个治疗组中,PP患者的人口统计学特征之间均无显着差异。在TOC,MXF和PIP / TAZ-AMC在PP和意向治疗(ITT)人群中具有相似的功效:MXF:76.4%,而PIP / TAZ-AMC:78.1%; PP人口中95%的置信区间(CI)-14.5%,9.0%; MXF:69.9%,而PIP / TAZ-AMC:69.1%; ITT人群中95%CI -12.4%,12.1%。两个治疗组的总体细菌学成功率相似(MXF:71.7%,而PIP / TAZ-AMC:71.8%; 95%CI -16.9%,10.7%)。在两个治疗组中,相似比例的患者(ITT人群)经历了任何不良事件(MXF:30.9%,而PIP / TAZ-AMC:31.8%)。 3例MXF治疗的患者和1例PIP / TAZ-AMC治疗的患者死亡。这些与研究药物无关。结论:莫西沙星在DFI患者中显示出良好的安全性和疗效,可作为DFI治疗的替代抗生素治疗。临床试验:NCT00402727。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号