首页> 外文期刊>Infection control and hospital epidemiology >Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
【24h】

Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

机译:评估利器安全装置:达到OSHA的意图。职业安全与健康管理局。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) revised the Bloodborne Pathogen Standard and, on July 17, 2001, began enforcing the use of appropriate and effective sharps devices with engineered sharps-injury protection. OSHA requires employers to maintain a sharps-injury log that records, among other items, the type and brand of contaminated sharps device involved in each injury. Federal OSHA does not require needlestick injury rates to be calculated by brand or type of device. A sufficient sample size to show a valid comparison of safety devices, based on injury rates, is rarely feasible in a single facility outside of a formal research trial. Thus, calculations of injury rates should not be used by employers for product evaluations to compare the effectiveness of safety devices. This article provides examples of sample-size requirements for statistically valid comparisons, ranging from 100,000 to 4.5 million of each device, depending on study design, and expected reductions in needlestick injury rates.
机译:美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)修订了《血源性病原体标准》,并于2001年7月17日开始强制使用具有工程技术的尖锐物保护装置的适当有效的尖锐物设备。 OSHA要求雇主保留锋利的伤害日志,其中应记录每次伤害所涉及的受污染的锋利器械的类型和品牌。联邦OSHA不需要根据品牌或设备类型来计算针刺伤害率。在正式研究试验之外的单个机构中,很少有足够的样本量来显示基于伤害率的安全装置的有效比较,这是不可能的。因此,雇主不应将伤害率的计算用于产品评估以比较安全装置的有效性。本文提供了样本数量要求的示例,以进行统计上有效的比较,具体取决于研究设计以及预期减少的针刺伤害率,每种设备的调查范围从100,000到450万不等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号