首页> 外文期刊>Infection control and hospital epidemiology >Workers' compensation claims for needlestick injuries among healthcare workers in Washington State, 1996-2000.
【24h】

Workers' compensation claims for needlestick injuries among healthcare workers in Washington State, 1996-2000.

机译:1996年至2000年,华盛顿州医护人员针刺受伤的工伤索赔。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To characterize accepted workers' compensation claims for needlestick injuries filed by healthcare workers (HCWs) in non-hospital compared with hospital settings in Washington State. DESIGN: Descriptive study of all accepted workers' compensation claims filed between 1996 and 2000 for needlestick injuries. PARTICIPANTS: All Washington State HCWs eligible to file a state fund workers' compensation claim and those who filed a workers' compensation claim for a needlestick injury. RESULTS: There were 3,303 accepted state fund HCW needlestick injury claims. The incidence of needlestick injury claims per 10,000 full-time-equivalent HCWs in hospitals was 158.6; in dental offices, 104.7; in physicians' offices, 87.0; and in skilled nursing facilities, 80.8. The most common mechanisms of needlestick injury by work location were as follows: for hospitals, suturing and other surgical procedures (16.7%), administering an injection (12.7%), and drawing blood (10%); for dentists' offices, recapping (21.3%) and cleaning trays and instruments (18.2%); for physicians' offices, disposal (22.2%) and administering an injection (10.2%); and for skilled nursing facilities, disposal (23.7%) and administering an injection (14.9%). Nurses accounted for the largest (29%) proportion of HCWs involved, followed by dental assistants (17%) and laboratory technicians and phlebotomists (12%) in non-hospital settings. Rates of needlestick injury claims increased for non-hospital settings by 7.5% annually (95% confidence interval [CI95], 4.89% to 10.22%; P < .0001). Rates decreased for hospital settings by 5.8% annually, but the decline was not statistically significant (CI95, -12.50% to 1.34%; P < .1088). HCWs were exposed to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency viruses in non-hospital settings. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in the incidence rate and mechanisms of needlestick injuries on review of workers' compensation claim records for HCWs in non-hospital and hospital settings.
机译:目的:与华盛顿州的医院环境相比,描述医疗保健工作者(HCW)在非医院提起的针头受伤事故的公认工人赔偿索赔。设计:对1996年至2000年之间因针刺受伤提出的所有可接受的工人赔偿要求的描述性研究。参与者:所有有资格提出州基金工人赔偿要求的华盛顿州医务工作者,以及因针刺伤害而提出工人赔偿要求的人。结果:有3,303个被接受的州基金医护人员针刺伤害索赔。医院每10,000名全职当量HCW发生针刺伤索赔的发生率为158.6;在牙科诊所,为104.7;在医生办公室,是87.0;在熟练的护理机构中为80.8。按工作地点划分的最常见针刺损伤机制如下:医院,缝合和其他外科手术(16.7%),注射(12.7%)和抽血(10%);用于牙医的办公室,其中有盖(21.3%)和清洁托盘和器械(18.2%);对于医师办公室,进行处置(22.2%)和进行注射(10.2%);对于熟练的护理设施,应进行处置(23.7%)和进行注射(14.9%)。在非医院环境中,护士占医务工作者的最大比例(29%),其次是牙科助理(17%),实验室技术人员和抽血医生(12%)。非医院环境下的针刺伤害索赔率每年增加7.5%(95%置信区间[CI95],4.89%至10.22%; P <.0001)。医院环境的患病率每年下降5.8%,但下降幅度没有统计学意义(CI95,-12.50%至1.34%; P <.1088)。医务工作者在非医院环境中暴露于乙型肝炎,丙型肝炎和人类免疫缺陷病毒。结论:在非医院和医院环境中,医护人员对医护人员的赔偿要求记录中针刺伤的发生率和机制存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号