...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Soil Conservation >Comparative evaluation of nearest neighbor and neural networks approach to estimate soil water retention at field capacity and permanent wilting point.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of nearest neighbor and neural networks approach to estimate soil water retention at field capacity and permanent wilting point.

机译:最近邻和神经网络方法的比较评估,以估算田间持水量和永久枯萎点处的土壤保水量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evaluation of neural and k nearest neighbor (kNN) techniques of developing pedotransfer functions (PTF) to predict soil water held at -33 kPa (Field Capacity FC) and -1500 kPa (Permanent Wilting Point PWP) of Vertisols of India is presented. Soil profile information of 26 representative sites comprising 157 soil samples was used for PTF development. Fotir levels of input information were used, (1) Textural data (data on sand, silt, and clay fraction-SSC), (2) Level 1+bulk density data (SSCBD), (3) Level 2+organic matter (SSCBDOM), and (4) Level 1+organic matter (SSCOM), kNN PTFs predicted FC with greater accuracy evidenced by lower root mean square error -RMSE (0.0695) compared to neural PTFs (0.0775). Performance of neural PTFs exhibited improvement in RMSE (from 0.076 to 0.0672) as the input variables increased. The performance of kNN PTF was better (RMSE, 0.0315) than neural PTF using input level 1 (RMSE, 0.0402) to estimate PWP. At highest level of input, neural and kNN PTFs were almost at par (RMSE, 0.0353 and 0.0358) in terms of prediction error. Better prediction by kNN PTFs (FC/PWP) with lowest input level (SSC) was significant as accurate predictions were possible without more input. In general, kNN PTFs showed advantage over neural PTFs.
机译:提出了神经和k最近邻技术(kNN)的技术评估,该技术开发了pedotransfer函数(PTF)以预测印度的Vertisols的-33 kPa(田间持水量FC)和-1500 kPa(永久降温点PWP)所持的土壤水。 PTF的开发使用了包括157个土壤样品的26个代表性地点的土壤剖面信息。使用了输入信息的FOTIR级别,(1)纹理数据(有关沙,粉砂和粘土分数的数据-SSC),(2)1级+堆积密度数据(SSCBD),(3)2级+有机物(SSCBDOM )和(4)1级+有机物(SSCOM),与神经PTF(0.0775)相比,kNN PTF预测FC的准确性更高,其均方根误差-RMSE(0.0695)更低。随着输入变量的增加,神经PTF的性能在RMSE方面有所改善(从0.076到0.0672)。使用输入水平1(RMSE,0.0402)估计PWP时,kNN PTF的性能(RMSE,0.0315)优于神经PTF。在最高输入水平上,就预测误差而言,神经和kNN PTF几乎处于标准水平(RMSE,0.0353和0.0358)。用最低输入水平(SSC)的kNN PTF(FC / PWP)进行更好的预测非常重要,因为无需更多输入就可以进行准确的预测。通常,kNN PTF比神经PTF具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号