首页> 外文期刊>British journal for the history of science >The conquest of vitalism or the eclipse of organicism? The 1930s Cambridge organizer project and the social network of mid-twentieth-century biology
【24h】

The conquest of vitalism or the eclipse of organicism? The 1930s Cambridge organizer project and the social network of mid-twentieth-century biology

机译:征服生命主义还是使有机主义黯然失色? 1930年代的剑桥组织者计划和20世纪中叶生物学的社会网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the 1930s, two concepts excited the European biological community: the organizer phenomenon and organicism. This essay examines the history of and connection between these two phenomena in order to address the conventional 'rise-and-fall' narrative that historians have assigned to each. Scholars promoted the 'rise-and-fall' narrative in connection with a broader account of the devitalizing of biology through the twentieth century. I argue that while limited evidence exists for the 'fall of the organizer concept' by the 1950s, the organicism that often motivated the organizer work had no concomitant fall - even during the mid-century heyday of molecular biology. My argument is based on an examination of shifting social networks of life scientists from the 1920s to the 1970s, many of whom attended or corresponded with members of the Cambridge Theoretical Biology Club (1932-1938). I conclude that the status and cohesion of these social networks at the micro scale was at least as important as macro-scale conceptual factors in determining the relative persuasiveness of organicist philosophy.
机译:在1930年代,欧洲生物界激发了两个概念:组织者现象和有机主义。本文探讨了这两种现象的历史以及它们之间的联系,以解决历史学家为这两种现象分配的常规“起伏”叙事。学者们提倡“兴衰”叙事,与对整个二十世纪生物灭活的更广泛描述有关。我认为,尽管到1950年代“组织者概念的衰落”的证据有限,但经常激发组织者工作的有机主义并没有随之而来的衰落-即使在分子生物学的全盛时期也是如此。我的论点基于对生命科学家社会网络从1920年代到1970年代的转变的考察,其中许多人参加或与剑桥理论生物学俱乐部(1932-1938)的成员通讯。我得出结论,在确定有机主义哲学的相对说服力时,这些社会网络在微观尺度上的地位和凝聚力至少与宏观尺度上的概念因素一样重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号