...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Systematic Botany >Re-evaluating species limits in Uncinia angustifolia, U. caespitosa s.str., U. rupestris, U. viridis and U. zotovii (Cyperaceae)
【24h】

Re-evaluating species limits in Uncinia angustifolia, U. caespitosa s.str., U. rupestris, U. viridis and U. zotovii (Cyperaceae)

机译:重新评估小叶菊(Uncinia angustifolia),caespitosa s.str。,U。rupestris,U。viridis和U. zotovii(莎草科)的物种限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Morphology of New Zealand hook sedges Uncinia angustifolia Hamlin, U. rupestris Raoul and U. zotovii Hamlin overlaps considerably, making species identification difficult. All three species have a complicated taxonomic history. U. angustifolia has been considered a variety of U. rupestris, which, in turn, has been considered a variety of U. caespitosa Boot or included in two other species. As for U. zotovii, this was originally part of U. caespitosa along with the grassland species U. viridis (C.B. Clarke) Edgar. The present study re-examines historical and recently collected material, and re-evaluates species limits for these five species using multivariate statistic analyses of morphological characters. Results confirm the circumscription of U. caespitosa s.str. and the segregation of U. viridis and U. zotovii from U. caespitosa s.lat., but they also indicate that current species descriptions are inaccurate and based on material of mixed identity. Results also suggest that U. angustifolia, U. rupestris and U. zotovii should be considered as three different species. U. viridis and U. rupestris are conspecific; the latter name has priority and should be maintained. An identification key, revised descriptions, new synonymy and distribution maps for the species recognised here are also presented.
机译:纽西兰钩状莎草的形态在一定程度上重合了Uncinia angustifolia Hamlin,U。rupestris Raoul和U. zotovii Hamlin。这三个物种都有复杂的分类历史。桔梗已被认为是多种U. rupestris,而后者又被认为是多种U. caespitosa Boot或包含在其他两个物种中。至于zotovii,这原本是caespitosa的一部分,与草地物种U.viridis(C.B. Clarke)Edgar一样。本研究重新审查了历史和最近收集的材料,并使用形态特征的多变量统计分析重新评估了这五个物种的物种限制。结果证实了U. caespitosa s.str。的限制。以及U. caespitosa s.lat。的U. viridis和U. zotovii的隔离,但它们也表明当前的物种描述不准确,并且基于混合身份的材料。结果还表明,应将U. angustifolia,U。rupestris和U. zotovii视为三个不同的物种。 U. viridis和U. rupestris是同种的。后一个名称具有优先权,应予以保留。还提供了此处识别的物种的识别码,修订的描述,新的同义词和分布图。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号