...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal for the history of science >Misperception, illusion and epistemological optimism: vision studies in early nineteenth-century Britain and Germany
【24h】

Misperception, illusion and epistemological optimism: vision studies in early nineteenth-century Britain and Germany

机译:误解,幻觉和认识论乐观主义:19世纪初英国和德国的视觉研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article compares investigations of the process of vision that were made in early nineteenth-century Britain and the German lands. It is argued that vision studies differed significantly east and west of the North Sea. Most of the German investigators had a medical background and many of them had a firm grasp of contemporary philosophy. In contrast, the British studies on vision emerged from the context of optics. This difference manifested itself in the conceptual tools for the analysis of vision, deception and illusion and shaped the experiments on visual phenomena that were carried out. Nevertheless, both in Britain and in the German lands vision studies were driven by the same impetus, by epistemological concerns with the nature and reliability of knowledge acquisition in experience. The general epistemological conclusions drawn from researches on vision and deception were optimistic. Precisely because mechanisms of deception and illusion could be uncovered, the possibility of acquiring empirical knowledge could be secured.
机译:本文比较了19世纪初期英国和德国土地上进行的视觉过程调查。有人认为,视觉研究在北海的东部和西部有显着差异。大多数德国研究人员具有医学背景,其中许多人对当代哲学有坚定的了解。相比之下,英国对视觉的研究源于光学。这种差异体现在用于分析视觉,欺骗和幻觉的概念工具中,并塑造了针对视觉现象的实验。然而,无论在英国还是在德国,视觉研究都是由相同的动力,认识论对经验中知识获取的性质和可靠性的驱动。从视觉和欺骗研究中得出的一般认识论结论是乐观的。正是因为可以发现欺骗和幻觉的机制,所以可以确保获得经验知识的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号