首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Nematology >Comparative field efficacy of chemical, botanical and biological agents against foliar nematode, Aphelenchoides besseyi infecting tuberose.
【24h】

Comparative field efficacy of chemical, botanical and biological agents against foliar nematode, Aphelenchoides besseyi infecting tuberose.

机译:化学,植物和生物制剂对叶面线虫侵染晚香玉的比较田间功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was conducted at Central Research Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Nadia, India with the treatments comprising of monocrotophos 36SL at 500 ppm (T1), carbosulfan 25EC at 750 ppm (T2), cartap hydrochloride 50WP at 750 ppm (T3), NSKE 10,000 ppm (T4), Pseudomonas fluorescens at 2 g/litre of water (T5), farmer's practice (T6) and untreated control (T7) to test the efficacy of chemical, botanical and biological formulations for managing foliar nematode problem in tuberose. Observation taken from November, 2004 to August, 2005 showed that incorporation of different formulations significantly reduced nematode attack as compared to untreated plots. The application of monocrotophos 36SL at 700 ppm as bulb treatment for 6 h followed by four foliar sprays at 15 days interval significantly reduced nematode disease in tuberose. The nematode infestation ranged from 29% to 55% in the untreated plot whereas in all the treated plots the infestation level was relatively low (14% to 37%) and the lowest (14% to 29%) infestation was observed in T1. The average number of flower stalk was the highest in T1 which was followed by T2, T3, T4 and T5. The PDI value varied from 13 to 36 in the treated plot, 26 to 48 in farmers' practice and 29 to 53 in the untreated plots. The nematode population per flower stalk was found maximum (mean population density 3403/flower stalk) in the untreated plots as compared to treated plots. Considering overall performance of the treatments, T1 was found to be the best treatment which was followed by T2, T3, T4 and T5. In terms of cost-benefit ratio, T1 ranked first followed by T5, T4, T2, T3 and T6.
机译:在印度纳迪亚的Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya的中央研究农场进行了田间试验,其中包括500 ppm(T 1 )的久效磷36SL,750 ppm(T )的硫丹25EC 2 ),浓度为750 ppm的盐酸羧甲基吡啶(T 3 ),NSKE 10,000 ppm(T 4 ),荧光假单胞菌 2克/升的水(T 5 ),农民的习惯做法(T 6 )和未经处理的对照(T 7 )来测试用于解决晚香玉叶中线虫问题的化学,植物和生物制剂。从2004年11月至2005年8月进行的观察表明,与未处理的地块相比,掺入不同的制剂可显着减少线虫的侵袭。以700 ppm的久效磷36SL进行鳞茎处理6 h,然后每隔15天进行四次叶面喷雾,可显着减少晚香玉的线虫病。在未处理的地块中,线虫的侵染范围为29%至55%,而在所有处理过的地块中,侵袭水平相对较低(14%至37%),在T 1 。 T 1 中花茎的平均数最高,其次是T 2 ,T 3 ,T 4 和T 5 。在处理过的地块中,PDI值从13到36不等,在农民实践中,PDI值在26到48之间,在未处理的地块中,PDI值在29到53之间。与未处理地块相比,未处理地块中每个花梗的线虫种群最大(平均种群密度3403 /花茎)。考虑到治疗的总体效果,发现T 1 是最好的治疗方法,其次是T 2 ,T 3 ,T 4 和T 5 。在成本效益比方面,T 1 排名第一,其次是T 5 ,T 4 ,T 2 ,T 3 和T 6

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号