...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of medical sciences. >Greek stroke score, Siriraj score and allen score in clinical diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage and infarct: Validation and comparison study.
【24h】

Greek stroke score, Siriraj score and allen score in clinical diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage and infarct: Validation and comparison study.

机译:希腊脑卒中评分,Siriraj评分和艾伦评分在脑出血和梗死的临床诊断中的有效性和比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To compare Greek stroke score with available previous two stroke scores for the diagnosis of cerebral ischemia and hemorrhage in acute stroke patients, and validate the Greek stroke score. SETTING: A tertiary hospital in India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study acute stroke patients were evaluated with Greek stroke score, Allen score and Siriraj stroke score. Comparability (Kappa Statistics) and validity (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value) of the Greek stroke score and previous scores were tested. RESULT: Out of the 91 patients enrolled in the study, 47 patients had cerebral infarction and 44 patients had hemorrhage by CT scan. Allen score was uncertain / equivocal in 39 patients, Siriraj Stroke score in 22 and Greek stroke score in 47 patients. Sensitivity, Specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value for Allen score were 0.5(95% CI:0.34,0.58), 0.94(95% CI:0.86,0.98), 0.81(95% CI:0.56,0.95), 0.78(95% CI: 0.71,0.81) for Siriraj score were 0.75(95% CI: 0.63,0.84), 0.81(95% CI: 0.71,0.89), 0.77(95% CI: 0.65,0.86), 0.78(95% CI 0.69,0.86) and for Greek Score were 0.42(95% CI: 0.23,0.53), 0.93(95% CI: 0.87,0.98), 0.71(95% CI:0.39,0.91), 0.81(95% CI:0.75,0.85) respectively. Greek stroke score was compared with previous scores using kappa statistics which revealed substantial strength of agreement between the Allen Score for certain results. CONCLUSION: The overall comparability of Greek stroke score and Allen score was better as compared to Greek stroke score and Siriraj stroke score. Greek Stroke score was more specific in diagnosing hemorrhage as compared to Siriraj score. However, all these stroke scores lack accuracy hence could not be applied safely to guide the physician in management of stroke.
机译:目的:将希腊中风评分与先前的两个中风评分进行比较,以诊断急性中风患者的脑缺血和出血,并验证希腊中风评分。地点:印度的一家三级医院。材料与方法:在一项前瞻性研究中,对急性卒中患者进行了希腊卒中评分,艾伦评分和Siriraj卒中评分评估。测试了希腊中风评分与先前评分的可比性(Kappa统计)和有效性(敏感性,特异性,阴性预测值和阳性预测值)。结果:在这项研究的91名患者中,通过CT扫描发现有47名脑梗死和44名出血。 39例患者的Allen评分不确定/模棱两可,Siriraj Stroke评分22例,希腊中风评分47例。艾伦评分的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值分别为0.5(95%CI:0.34,0.58),0.94(95%CI:0.86,0.98),0.81(95%CI:0.56,0.95),0.78( Siriraj得分的95%CI:0.71,0.81)分别为0.75(95%CI:0.63,0.84),0.81(95%CI:0.71,0.89),0.77(95%CI:0.65,0.86),0.78(95%CI 0.69,0.86)和希腊分数分别为0.42(95%CI:0.23,0.53),0.93(95%CI:0.87,0.98),0.71(95%CI:0.39,0.91),0.81(95%CI:0.75, 0.85)。使用kappa统计数据将希腊中风得分与以前的得分进行了比较,该结果表明,对于某些结果,艾伦得分之间的一致性非常强。结论:希腊中风评分和艾伦评分的总体可比性优于希腊中风评分和Siriraj中风评分。与Siriraj评分相比,希腊中风评分在诊断出血方面更具特异性。但是,所有这些中风评分均缺乏准确性,因此无法安全地用于指导医师进行中风管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号