首页> 外文期刊>IFLA Journal >Locating librarianship's identity in its historical roots of professional philosophies: Towards a radical new identity for librarians of today (and tomorrow)
【24h】

Locating librarianship's identity in its historical roots of professional philosophies: Towards a radical new identity for librarians of today (and tomorrow)

机译:在专业哲学的历史根源中定位图书馆员的身份:为当今(和明天)的图书馆员提供一个全新的根本身份

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

'Librarian identity' is a contested arena, seemingly caught up in a values-war between traditional principles of 'citizenship' and late 20th century's shift to a democracy of consumerists. New professionals may be wary of associating with established systems of their own professional hierarchies when professional associations may be perceived as not having paid enough attention to how this shift in values has been effected, yet this is the key question to address: how has this shift towards 'information management/consumption'; the library member now as 'customer'; and new models of library provision by private or social enterprises, impacted on the profession's identity as a whole? What does it means to call yourself a Librarian in the 21st century? This paper will trace the roots of the philosophy of Librarianship, in its changing shapes, to establish how professional identities are formed, ranging from Edwards and Dewey's originating 'librarian' as book keeper/cataloguer or library 'economiser'; through to Otlet and Shera's 'Documentationalist'; Ranganathan's librarian 'helper'; and present day incarnations such as Lankes' librarian as 'community knowledge creation facilitator'. Incorporating historical analysis of the roots of librarianship's philosophies, this paper develops a thesis relating to how modern day librarian professionals, practicing in non-traditional areas and ways, may be helpful in suggesting a route out of the LIS echo-chamber of identity crisis, alongside the evidence of librarianship's historical trail. It is proposed that by investigating librarianship's underlying philosophies, and by listening to those who may not necessarily have traditional library qualifications or work in traditional settings, but who work as members of the profession in information and info-literacy skills, a way to forging a new identity can be observed. Examples of memberon-member outreach and activities are provided to illustrate how this new identity can be shaped to rise, phoenix-like, in a radical new, engaging, and engaged form.
机译:“图书馆员身份”是一个有争议的舞台,似乎陷入了传统的“公民身份”原则与20世纪末向消费主义民主制转变之间的价值战。当专业协会可能被认为没有充分重视这种价值转变的实现方式时,新的专业人员可能会警惕与自己的专业等级体系建立联系,但这是要解决的关键问题:这种转变如何发生走向“信息管理/消费”;库成员现在是“客户”;以及私营或社会企业提供图书馆的新模式,对整个行业的整体身份产生了影响?自称21世纪的图书馆员意味着什么?本文将以不断变化的形态追溯图书馆学哲学的根源,以建立职业身份的形成方式,从爱德华兹和杜威的原始“图书馆员”担任簿记员/目录或图书馆的“经济学家”。直至奥特莱特和谢拉(Otlet and Shera)的“文献学家”; Ranganathan的图书管理员“助手”;如今的化身,例如Lankes的馆员,他是“社区知识创造的促进者”。结合对图书馆管理哲学根源的历史分析,本文提出了一篇有关现代图书馆专业人员如何在非传统领域和领域进行实践的论文,可能有助于提出一条走出身份认同危机的LIS回声腔的途径,以及图书馆事业的历史痕迹。建议通过调查图书馆学的基本哲学,并听取那些不一定具有传统图书馆资格或在传统环境中工作,但作为信息和信息素养技能专业人士工作的人们的声音,这是锻造图书馆知识的一种方法。可以观察到新的身份。提供了成员/非成员外展和活动的示例,以说明如何以一种全新的,吸引人的和参与的形式来塑造这种新身份,使其像凤凰似的升起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号