首页> 外文期刊>IFLA Journal >Capitalizing on a past investment: why we need bibliometric studies of social science literature again
【24h】

Capitalizing on a past investment: why we need bibliometric studies of social science literature again

机译:利用过去的投资:为什么我们需要再次进行社会科学文献的文献计量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION The 1970s were an important decade for research into library and information science. Governments around the world, particularly in North America and Western Europe, made funds available for projects at a higher level than in the past. Obtaining research funds was easier in many respects. The funding agencies were willing to examine proposals for investigations which were often of an exploratory nature. At the same time the library and information schools were expanding and developing research programmes backed by their universities and polytechnics. It was also a time when methodology was becoming important. Project INFROSS investigated the information needs of social scientists. Towards the end of the project, discussions took place between Maurice Line, Michael Brittain, Stephen Roberts and other members of the research team at Bath University and David Nicholas, Maureen Ritchie and Patricia Layzell Ward at the School of Librarianship at the Polytechnic of North London which laid the foundation for collaboration on a project known as DISISS (Design of Information Systems in the Social Sciences). The work was carried out between 1971-1975 and funded by the British Library Research and Development Department and the Polytechnic of North London. The aim of DISISS was to isolate some significant questions about published secondary services -- "because they exist in large numbers, they cost in total a great deal to produce, buy and use, they are grossly underused..."(FN1) The project consisted of a series of sub-studies that examined the literature of the social sciences. Maurice Line has drawn attention to features of social science information that distinguish it from the sciences, this includes instability and imprecision since they are concerned with the behavior of human beings. He considered that there "can be no general consensus, over time or place, on the classification and terminology of the social sciences".
机译:简介1970年代是图书馆和信息科学研究的重要十年。世界各地的政府,尤其是北美和西欧的政府,为项目提供的资金比过去更高。在许多方面,获得研究资金更为容易。资助机构愿意审查通常具有探索性质的调查建议。同时,图书馆和信息学校正在扩大和发展由其大学和理工学院支持的研究计划。这也是方法论变得重要的时期。 INFROSS项目调查了社会科学家的信息需求。在项目结束前,莫里斯·莱恩(Maurice Line),迈克尔·布里顿(Michael Brittain),斯蒂芬·罗伯茨(Stephen Roberts)和巴斯大学研究团队的其他成员以及北伦敦理工大学图书馆学系的大卫·尼古拉斯(David Nicholas),莫琳·里奇(Maureen Ritchie)和帕特里夏·莱泽尔·沃德(Patricia Layzell Ward)之间进行了讨论。这为称为DISISS(社会科学中的信息系统设计)的项目奠定了合作基础。这项工作是在1971年至1975年之间进行的,并由大英图书馆研究与发展部和北伦敦理工学院资助。 DISISS的目的是隔离一些有关已发布的二级服务的重大问题-“由于它们大量存在,因此它们在生产,购买和使用中的总成本很高,因此它们的使用率严重不足...”(FN1)该项目由一系列研究社会科学文献的子研究组成。莫里斯·莱恩(Maurice Line)提请注意社会科学信息的特征,这些特征将其与科学区分开来,这包括不稳定和不精确性,因为它们与人类的行为有关。他认为,“关于社会科学的分类和术语,在时间或地点上无法达成普遍共识”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号