首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >CEF is superior to CMF for tumours with TOP2A aberrations: a Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis on Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study 89D.
【24h】

CEF is superior to CMF for tumours with TOP2A aberrations: a Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis on Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study 89D.

机译:对于具有TOP2A畸变的肿瘤,CEF优于CMF:丹麦乳腺癌合作小组研究89D的亚人群治疗效果模式图(STEPP)分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to examine TOP2A gene copy number changes as a means to identify groups of breast cancer patients with superior benefit from treatment with anthracyclines. Tumour tissue was retrospectively collected and successfully analysed for TOP2A in 773 of 980 Danish patients randomly assigned to receive intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) or CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil) in DBCG trial 89D. Subgroup analyses on this material published by Knoop et al. (J Clin Oncol 23:7483-7490, 2005) and updated by Nielsen et al. (Acta Oncol 47:725-734, 2008) demonstrated that superiority of CEF over CMF is limited to patients with TOP2A aberrations, defined as patients whose tumours have TOP2A ratio below 0.8 or above 2.0. The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) technique was applied to these data to explore the pattern of treatment effect relative to TOP2A and to compare that pattern to the ranges previously used to define 'aberrations'. The pattern of treatment effect illustrated by the STEPP analysis confirmed that the superiority of CEF over CMF is indeed limited to patients whose tumours have high or low TOP2A ratios. The hypothesis of no treatment effect-covariate interaction was rejected (P = 0.02). Furthermore, results indicated that the interval of TOP2A ratios hitherto denoted as 'normal' could be narrower than previously assumed. A more optimal separation of TOP2A subgroups could be obtained by altering cut-points currently used to define TOP2A amplified and TOP2A deleted tumours by narrowing the TOP2A normal interval, and consequently enlarging the population with TOP2A aberrated tumours.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查TOP2A基因拷贝数的变化,以鉴定出从蒽环类药物治疗中受益更大的乳腺癌患者群体。回顾性收集了肿瘤组织,并在DBCG试验89D中随机分配了接受静脉CMF(环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶)或CEF(环磷酰胺,表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶)的980名丹麦患者中的773名患者,对其肿瘤TOP2A进行了成功分析。由Knoop等人发表的对该材料的亚组分析。 (J Clin Oncol 23:7483-7490,2005)并由Nielsen等更新。 (Acta Oncol 47:725-734,2008)证明,CEF优于CMF的优势仅限于TOP2A畸变的患者,TOP2A畸变是指肿瘤中TOP2A比率低于0.8或高于2.0的患者。将亚人群治疗效果模式图(STEPP)技术应用于这些数据,以探索相对于TOP2A的治疗效果模式,并将该模式​​与先前用于定义“像差”的范围进行比较。 STEPP分析显示的治疗效果模式证实,CEF优于CMF的优势确实仅限于肿瘤中TOP2A比率高或低的患者。没有治疗效果-协变量相互作用的假说被驳回(P = 0.02)。此外,结果表明,迄今表示为“正常”的TOP2A比值的间隔可能比以前假定的要窄。通过改变当前用于定义TOP2A扩增和TOP2A缺失的肿瘤的切点,可以通过缩小TOP2A正常间隔,从而扩大TOP2A亚组的分离,从而扩大具有TOP2A畸变肿瘤的人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号