首页> 外文期刊>IBIS >On the importance of g(0) for estimating bird population densities with standard distance-sampling: implications from a telemetry study and a literature review
【24h】

On the importance of g(0) for estimating bird population densities with standard distance-sampling: implications from a telemetry study and a literature review

机译:关于g(0)在用标准距离采样估算鸟类种群密度中的重要性:遥测研究和文献综述的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Raw count data are often used to estimate bird population densities. However, such data do not consider detection probability. As an alternative, methods that model detection probability such as distance-sampling have been proposed. However, standard distance-sampling provides reliable estimates for absolute density only when the underlying assumptions are met. One of the most critical of these assumptions is that animals on a transect line or at an observation point have to be detected with certainty (the g(0) = 1 assumption). We radiotagged nine Orphean Warblers Sylvia hortensis and estimated their short-distance detection probability. Birds were radio-located in 264 cases in single bushes or trees. Their visual detection probability after a 5-min search was only 0.58 (sd = pl0.14, range = 0.38-0.80), although the observer knew the bird's location. Furthermore, we carried out a literature review to assess how the g(0) = 1 assumption is handled in practice. None of the 28 standard distance-sampling papers reviewed contained an estimation of g(0). In 57% of the papers, the g(0) = 1 assumption was not even mentioned. Nevertheless, none of the authors declared their estimates as being relative. Our empirical data show that the g(0) = 1 assumption would be severely violated for a foliage-gleaning bird species at a desert stopover site outside the breeding season. The literature review revealed that the testing of the g(0) = 1 assumption is largely ignored in practice. We strongly suggest that more attention should be paid to the testing of this key assumption, because results may not be reliable when it is violated. If it is not possible to test the g(0) = 1 assumption or g(0) is less than 1, alternative methods should be used. Another possibility is to estimate detection probability by the means of radiotagged individuals.
机译:原始计数数据通常用于估计鸟类种群密度。但是,此类数据不考虑检测概率。作为替代,已经提出了对检测概率进行建模的方法,例如距离采样。但是,仅在满足基本假设的情况下,标准距离采样才能提供可靠的绝对密度估计值。这些假设中最重要的假设之一是,必须确定检测横断线上或观察点处的动物(g(0)= 1假设)。我们对9个Orphean莺Sylvia hortensis进行了放射性标记,并估计了它们的短距离检测概率。鸟类被无线电定位在264个案例中的单个灌木丛或树木中。尽管观察者知道了鸟类的位置,但经过5分钟的搜索后,它们的视觉检测概率仅为0.58(sd = pl0.14,范围= 0.38-0.80)。此外,我们进行了文献综述,以评估在实践中如何处理g(0)= 1的假设。所审查的28篇标准距离采样论文均未包含g(0)的估计值。在57%的论文中,甚至没有提到g(0)= 1的假设。然而,没有作者宣称他们的估计是相对的。我们的经验数据表明,在繁殖季节以外的沙漠中途停留地,采集树叶的鸟类会严重违反g(0)= 1的假设。文献综述表明,在实践中很大程度上忽略了对g(0)= 1假设的检验。我们强烈建议应更多地关注此关键假设的测试,因为违反该结果可能并不可靠。如果无法测试g(0)= 1假设或g(0)小于1,则应使用替代方法。另一种可能性是通过放射性标记的个体来估计检测概率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号