首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Direct measurement of ozone production rates in Houston in 2009 and comparison with two estimation methods
【24h】

Direct measurement of ozone production rates in Houston in 2009 and comparison with two estimation methods

机译:直接测量2009年休斯顿的臭氧生产速率,并与两种估算方法进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Net ozone production rates, P(O_3), were measured directly using the Penn State Measurement of Ozone Production Sensor (MOPS) during the Study of Houston Atmospheric Radical Precursors (SHARP, 2009). Measured P(O_3) peaked in the late morning, with values between 15 ppbv h~(-1) and 100 ppbv h~(?1), although values of 40-80 ppbv h~(?1) were typical for higher ozone days. These measurements were compared against ozone production rates calculated using measurements of hydroperoxyl (HO_2), hydroxyl (OH), and nitric oxide (NO) radicals, called "calculated P(O_3)". The same comparison was done using modeled radicals obtained from a box model with the RACM2 mechanism, called "modeled P(O_3)". Measured and calculated P(O_3) had similar peak values but the calculated P(O_3) tended to peak earlier in the morning when NO values were higher. Measured and modeled P(O_3) had a similar dependence on NO, but the modeled P(O_3) was only half the measured P(O_3). The modeled P(O_3) is less than the calculated P(O_3) because the modeled HO_2 is less than the measured HO_2. While statistical analyses are not conclusive regarding the comparison between MOPS measurements and the two estimation methods, the calculated P(O_3) with measured HO_2 produces peak values similar to the measured P(O_3) when ozone is high. Although the MOPS is new and more testing is required to verify its observations, the measurements in the SHARP field campaign show the potential of this new technique for contributing to the understanding of ozone-producing chemistry and to the monitoring of ozone's response to future air quality regulatory actions.
机译:在休斯顿大气自由基前体的研究过程中(SHARP,2009),直接使用宾夕法尼亚州臭氧生产传感器的宾州状态测量法测量了净臭氧产生速率P(O_3)。测得的P(O_3)在清晨达到峰值,其值在15 ppbv h〜(-1)和100 ppbv h〜(?1)之间,尽管40-80 ppbv h〜(?1)对于较高的臭氧是典型的天。将这些测量值与使用过氧化氢(HO_2),羟基(OH)和一氧化氮(NO)自由基的测量值(称为“计算的P(O_3)”)计算出的臭氧生产率进行比较。使用从具有RACM2机制的盒模型中获得的模型化基团(称为“模型化P(O_3)”)进行了相同的比较。测量和计算出的P(O_3)的峰值相似,但是当NO值较高时,计算出的P(O_3)倾向于在早上更早达到峰值。测量和建模的P(O_3)对NO的依赖性相似,但是建模的P(O_3)仅为测量的P(O_3)的一半。建模的P(O_3)小于计算的P(O_3),因为建模的HO_2小于测量的HO_2。尽管统计分析对于MOPS测量和两种估算方法之间的比较尚无定论,但当臭氧含量较高时,使用测得的HO_2计算出的P(O_3)会产生类似于测得的P(O_3)的峰值。尽管MOPS是新的并且需要更多测试来验证其观测结果,但是SHARP野外活动的测量结果表明,这项新技术具有潜力,有助于理解臭氧产生化学物质并监测臭氧对未来空气质量的响应监管行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号