首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Ozone monitoring instrument spectral UV irradiance products: Comparison with ground based measurements at an urban environment
【24h】

Ozone monitoring instrument spectral UV irradiance products: Comparison with ground based measurements at an urban environment

机译:臭氧监测仪光谱紫外线辐射产品:与城市环境中基于地面的测量结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have compared spectral ultraviolet overpass irradiances from the Ozone Monitoring Instruments (OMI) against ground-based Brewer measurements at Thessaloniki, Greece from September 2004 to December 2007. It is demonstrated that OMI overestimates UV irradiances by 30%, 17% and 13% for 305 nm, 324 nm, and 380 nm respectively and 20% for erythemally weighted irradiance. The bias between OMI and Brewer increases with increasing aerosol absorption optical thickness. We present methodologies that can be applied for correcting this bias based on experimental results derived from the comparison period and also theoretical approaches using radiative transfer model calculations. All correction approaches minimize the bias and the standard deviation of the ratio OMI versus Brewer ratio. According to the results, the best correction approach suggests that the OMI UV product has to be multiplied by a correction factor CA of the order of 0.8, 0.88 and 0.9 for 305 nm, 324 nm and 380 nm respectively. Limitations and possibilities for applying such methodologies in a global scale are also discussed.
机译:我们将2004年9月至2007年12月在希腊塞萨洛尼基的臭氧监测仪器(OMI)的光谱紫外线越过辐照度与地面Brewer测量值进行了比较。结果表明,OMI高估了紫外线辐照度30%,17%和13%分别为305 nm,324 nm和380 nm,对于红斑加权辐照度为20%。 OMI和Brewer之间的偏差会随着气溶胶吸收光学厚度的增加而增加。我们根据比较期间得出的实验结果以及使用辐射传输模型计算的理论方法,提出了可用于纠正此偏差的方法。所有校正方法都将OMI与Brewer之比的偏差和标准偏差降至最低。根据结果​​,最佳校正方法表明,对于305 nm,324 nm和380 nm,OMI UV乘积必须分别乘以0.8、0.88和0.9数量级的校正因子CA。还讨论了在全球范围内应用此类方法的局限性和可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号