...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Genetics >Addressing the dark matter of gene therapy: technical and ethical barriers to clinical application
【24h】

Addressing the dark matter of gene therapy: technical and ethical barriers to clinical application

机译:解决基因治疗的暗物质:临床应用的技术和伦理障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Gene therapies for genetic diseases have been sought for decades, and the relatively recent development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system has encouraged a new wave of interest in the field. There have nonetheless been significant setbacks to gene therapy, including unintended biological consequences, ethical scandals, and death. The major focus of research has been on technological problems such as delivery, potential immune responses, and both on and off-target effects in an effort to avoid negative clinical outcomes. While the field has concentrated on how we can better achieve gene therapies and gene editing techniques, there has been less focus on when and why we should use such technology. Here we combine discussion of both the technical and ethical barriers to the widespread clinical application of gene therapy and gene editing, providing a resource for gene therapy experts and novices alike. We discuss ethical problems and solutions, using cystic fibrosis and beta-thalassemia as case studies where gene therapy might be suitable, and provide examples of situations where human germline gene editing may be ethically permissible. Using such examples, we propose criteria to guide researchers and clinicians in deciding whether or not to pursue gene therapy as a treatment. Finally, we summarize how current progress in the field adheres to principles of biomedical ethics and highlight how this approach might fall short of ethical rigour using examples in the bioethics literature. Ultimately by addressing both the technical and ethical aspects of gene therapy and editing, new frameworks can be developed for the fair application of these potentially life-saving treatments.
机译:几十年来,人们一直在寻找遗传疾病的基因疗法,而CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑系统相对较新的发展激发了人们对该领域的新一波兴趣。尽管如此,基因治疗还是遭遇了重大挫折,包括意想不到的生物学后果、伦理丑闻和死亡。研究的主要重点是技术问题,如递送、潜在的免疫反应以及靶向和脱靶效应,以避免负面的临床结果。虽然该领域专注于如何更好地实现基因疗法和基因编辑技术,但对何时以及为什么应该使用此类技术的关注较少。在这里,我们结合了对基因治疗和基因编辑广泛临床应用的技术和伦理障碍的讨论,为基因治疗专家和新手提供了资源。我们讨论了伦理问题和解决方案,使用囊性纤维化和β-地中海贫血作为基因治疗可能适用的案例研究,并提供了人类生殖系基因编辑可能在伦理上允许的情况的例子。使用这些例子,我们提出了一些标准来指导研究人员和临床医生决定是否将基因疗法作为一种治疗方法。最后,我们总结了该领域目前的进展如何遵守生物医学伦理学原则,并使用生物伦理学文献中的例子强调了这种方法如何可能缺乏伦理严谨性。最终,通过解决基因治疗和编辑的技术和伦理问题,可以开发新的框架来公平应用这些可能挽救生命的治疗方法。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号