首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer - results of the ALMANAC validation phase.
【24h】

Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer - results of the ALMANAC validation phase.

机译:影响乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检定位失败和假阴性率的因素-ALMANAC验证阶段的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early stage breast cancer, there is a wide variation in reported test performance characteristics. A major aim of this prospective multicentre validation study was to quantify detection and false-negative rates of SLNB and evaluate factors influencing them. METHODS: Eight-hundred and fourty-two patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer underwent SLNB according to a standardised protocol that used a combination of radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-albumin colloid and Patent Blue V dye. SLNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation in all patients. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified in 803 (96.1%) of 836 evaluable cases. The median number of SLNs removed per patient was 2 (range 1-9). There were 19 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 263/282 (93.3%) and accuracy 782/803 (97.6%). SLNs were successfully identified by blue dye in 698 (85.6%), by isotope in 698 (85.6%), and by the combination of blue dye and isotope in 782 (96.0%) of 815 patients. Among 276 node positive patients, one or more positive SLNs were identified by blue dye in 251 (90.9%), by isotope in 246 (89.1%) and by the combination of blue dye and gamma probe in 258 (93.5%). Obesity, tumor location other than upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of SLNs on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan were significantly associated with failed localisation (p<0.001, p=0.008, p<0.001, respectively). The false-negative rate in patients with grade 3 tumors was 9.6%, compared with 4.7% in those with grade 2 tumors (p=0.022). The false-negative rate in patients who had one SLN harvested was 10.1%, compared with 1.1% in those who had multiple SLNs (three or more) removed (p=0.010). CONCLUSION: SLNB can accurately determine whether axillary metastases are present in patients with early stage breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Both success and accuracy of SLNB are optimised by the combined use of blue dye and isotope. SLNB success decreases with increasing body mass, tumor location other than the upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of hot nodes on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan. This study demonstrates reduction in the predictive value of a negative SLNB in grade 3 tumors.
机译:背景:尽管前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)在早期乳腺癌中得到广泛应用,但报告的测试性能特征仍有很大差异。这项前瞻性多中心验证研究的主要目的是量化SLNB的检出率和假阴性率,并评估影响它们的因素。方法:八百四十二例临床淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者根据标准化方案接受了SLNB治疗,该方案结合了放射性药物99mTc-白蛋白胶体和专利蓝V染料。在所有患者中,SLNB均在同一手术后进行标准腋窝治疗。结果:在836例可评估病例中,有803例(96.1%)被确定为前哨淋巴结。每位患者去除的SLN的中位数为2(范围1-9)。有19个假阴性,导致灵敏度为263/282(93.3%)和准确性为782/803(97.6%)。在815例患者中,成功地通过698例蓝色染料(85.6%),通过698例同位素(85.6%)以及通过蓝色染料和同位素的组合成功鉴定了SLNs。在276例淋巴结阳性患者中,一种或多种阳性SLN被251例蓝色染料(90.9%),同位素246例(89.1%)和258例蓝色染料和伽马探针组合鉴定(93.5%)。肥胖,肿瘤位置除上象限外和术前淋巴结扫描不可见SLNs与定位失败显着相关(分别为p <0.001,p = 0.008,p <0.001)。 3级肿瘤患者的假阴性率为9.6%,而2级肿瘤患者的假阴性率为4.7%(p = 0.022)。收获了一个SLN的患者中假阴性率为10.1%,而去除了多个SLN(三个或更多)的患者中的假阴性率为1.1%(p = 0.010)。结论:SLNB可以准确确定腋窝淋巴结临床阴性的早期乳腺癌患者是否存在腋窝转移。通过结合使用蓝色染料和同位素,可以优化SLNB的成功性和准确性。 SLNB成功率随体重增加,肿瘤位置(上上象限以外)和术前淋巴结扫描不可见热结点而降低。这项研究表明阴性SLNB在3级肿瘤中的预测价值降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号