...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Physics >Universally coupled massive gravity, III: dRGT-Maheshwari pure spin-2, Ogievetsky-Polubarinov and arbitrary mass terms
【24h】

Universally coupled massive gravity, III: dRGT-Maheshwari pure spin-2, Ogievetsky-Polubarinov and arbitrary mass terms

机译:万能引力,III:dRGT-Maheshwari pure spin-2,Ogievetsky-Polubarinov和任意质量项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Einstein's equations were derived for a free massless spin-2 field using universal coupling in the 1950-1970s by various authors; total stress-energy including gravity's served as a source for linear free field equations. A massive variant was likewise derived in the late 1960s by Freund, Maheshwari and Schonberg, and thought to be unique. How broad is universal coupling? In the last decade four 1-parameter families of massive spin-2 theories (contravariant, covariant, tetrad, and cotetrad of almost any density weights) have been derived using universal coupling. The (co)tetrad derivations included 2 of the 3 pure spin-2 theories due to de Rham, Gabadadze, and Tolley; those two theories first appeared in the 2-parameter Ogievetsky-Polubarinov family (1965), which developed the symmetric square root of the metric as a nonlinear group realization. One of the two theories was identified as pure spin-2 by Maheshwari in 1971-1972, thus evading the Boulware-Deser-Tyutin-Fradkin ghost by the time it was announced. Unlike the previous 4 families, this paper permits nonlinear field redefinitions to build the effective metric. By not insisting in advance on knowing the observable significance of the graviton potential to all orders, one finds that an arbitrary graviton mass term can be derived using universal coupling. The arbitrariness of a universally coupled mass/self-interaction term contrasts sharply with the uniqueness of the Einstein kinetic term. One might have hoped to use universal coupling as a tie-breaking criterion for choosing among theories that are equally satisfactory on more crucial grounds (such as lacking ghosts and having a smooth massless limit). But the ubiquity of universal coupling implies that the criterion does not favor any particular theories among those with the Einstein kinetic term. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:爱因斯坦方程是在1950-1970年代利用通用耦合方法针对自由无质量spin-2场而得出的;包括重力在内的总应力能用作线性自由场方程的来源。同样,1960年代后期,Freund,Maheshwari和Schonberg派生了一个巨大的变体,并且被认为是独一无二的。通用耦合的范围有多大?在过去的十年中,使用通用耦合推导了四个自旋2理论的四个1参数族(几乎所有密度权重的逆变,协变,tetrad和cotetrad)。 (共)四元导数包括3种纯自旋2理论中的2种,这是由于德拉姆,加巴达兹和托利所致;这两个理论首先出现在2参数的Ogievetsky-Polubarinov系列(1965)中,该系列将度量的对称平方根发展为非线性组实现。 Maheshwari在1971-1972年将这两种理论之一确定为纯自旋2,因此在其宣布之时就逃避了Boulware-Deser-Tyutin-Fradkin鬼魂。与之前的4个系列不同,本文允许非线性场重新定义以建立有效的度量。通过不事先坚持知道引力子势对所有阶的可观察的重要性,人们发现可以使用通用耦合来推导任意引力子质量项。普遍耦合的质量/自相互作用项的任意性与爱因斯坦动力学项的唯一性形成鲜明对比。可能有人希望将通用耦合作为打破平局的准则,以便在更为关键的基础上(例如,缺少幻影并具有平滑的无质量限制)在同样令人满意的理论之间进行选择。但是普遍耦合的普遍性意味着该标准不支持爱因斯坦动力学项中的任何特定理论。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号