...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study
【24h】

Repetitive facilitative exercise under continuous electrical stimulation for severe arm impairment after sub-acute stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study

机译:连续电刺激下亚急性脑卒中后严重手臂损伤的重复促进运动:一项随机对照试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of repetitive facilitative exercise (RFE) under surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Methods: This randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, pilot trial randomized 27 adults with severe arm impairment [Fugl-Meyer Arm scale (FMA) - 20] due to stroke of 3-13 weeks duration into three groups and provided treatment on a 4-week, 40 minutes/day, 5 days/week schedule. The RFE-under-NMES group were given 100-150 repetitions of standardized movements of shoulder, elbow and wrist joints of their affected arm with concurrent low-amplitude NMES for each corresponding musculature. The RFE group was given the same exercise regimen but without NMES. The control group was treated with a conventional arm rehabilitation programme without NMES. FMA was assessed at baseline and 4 weeks. Results: All 27 participants (nine in each group) completed the trial. At 4 weeks, the RFE-under-NMES group evidenced significantly greater improvement compared with the control group on the FMA (p = 0.003), but not with the RFE group (p = 0.092). The RFE group showed improvement compared with the control group, but it was not significant (p = 0.199). Conclusions: RFE under NMES is feasible in clinical settings and may be more effective than conventional rehabilitation in lessening arm impairment after sub-acute stroke.
机译:目的:探讨在表面神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)下进行重复促进运动(RFE)对卒中后偏瘫患者的疗效。方法:这项随机,对照,观察者盲的试验性试验将27例因中风3-13周而遭受严重手臂损伤[Fugl-Meyer臂秤(FMA)-20]的成年人随机分为三组,并在4 -周,每天40分钟,每天5天。在RFE-NMES小组中,对每个相应的肌肉组织进行100-150次重复的受累手臂的肩,肘和腕关节标准化运动,并同时进行低振幅NMES。 RFE组接受了相同的锻炼方案,但没有NMES。对照组接受常规的无NMES的手臂康复计划。在基线和4周时评估FMA。结果:所有27名参与者(每组9名)完成了试验。在第4周时,RFE-NMES干预组与FMA对照组相比有显着改善(p = 0.003),而RFE组则没有(p = 0.092)。与对照组相比,RFE组显示出改善,但无统计学意义(p = 0.199)。结论:NMES下的RFE在临床环境中是可行的,并且在减轻亚急性中风后的手臂损伤方面可能比常规康复更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号